Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Misclassified as Achieving a Complete Clinical Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Author:

Chung Rainjade1ORCID,Kurtzman Jane T.1ORCID,Joffe Benjamin I.1ORCID,Vila-Reyes Helena1,Miles Caleb H.12ORCID,DeCastro Guarionex J.1,Anderson Christopher B.1,Wei Alexander Z.3ORCID,Drake Charles G.3,McKiernan James M.1,Lenis Andrew T.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Urology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York

2. Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York

3. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York

Abstract

Introduction: Correctly classifying patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) as achieving a complete clinical response (CCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is challenging without radical cystectomy (RC) pathology. The accuracy of clinical staging following NAC is debated, and the risk of occult residual MIBC is real. We present the rate and oncologic outcomes of patients who were misclassified as achieving a CCR to NAC. Materials and Methods: We utilized our prospective database of patients who achieved a CCR to NAC and elected active surveillance (AS). Patients with intravesical MIBC within 6 months of CCR classification were defined as potentially misclassified (mCCR). We used Kaplan-Meier curves to assess overall (OS), cancer-specific (CSS), and metastasis-free (MFS) survival and log-rank tests to evaluate differences between cohorts. Results: Fifty-four patients, median age of 70 years and follow-up of 49 months, were included. Six patients (11%) were mCCR, and all underwent delayed RC at a mean of 4.3 months after CCR classification. Pre-NAC hydronephrosis was more common in mCCR patients (67% vs 8%, P < .01). Five-year OS, CSS, and MFS for mCCR patients were 63% each, compared with 80%, 89%, and 93%, for the remaining patients. Log-rank tests demonstrated significantly lower OS (P = .03) and MFS (P = .05) in mCCR patients. Conclusions: We observed an 11% CCR misclassification rate. While mCCR patients had significantly worse OS and MFS compared with correctly classified CCR patients, we cannot know for certain how survival outcomes would have changed with immediate RC. Our findings are useful when describing the risks of misclassification to CCR patients contemplating AS.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3