Orthopaedic Trauma and Anemia: Conservative versus Liberal Transfusion Strategy: A Prospective Randomized Study

Author:

Mullis Brian H.1ORCID,Mullis Leilani S.1,Kempton Laurence B.1,Virkus Walter1,Slaven James E.1,Bruggers Jennifer2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; and

2. Department of Orthopaedics, Wellstar Health System, Marietta, GA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether it is safe to use a conservative packed red blood cell transfusion hemoglobin (Hgb) threshold (5.5 g/dL) compared with a liberal transfusion threshold (7.0 g/dL) for asymptomatic musculoskeletal injured trauma patients who are no longer in the initial resuscitative period. METHODS: Design: Prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Setting: Three level 1 trauma centers. Patient Selection Criteria: Patients aged 18–50 with an associated musculoskeletal injury with Hgb less than 9 g/dL or expected drop below 9 g/dL with planned surgery who were stable and no longer being actively resuscitated were randomized once their Hgb dropped below 7 g/dL to a conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL versus a liberal threshold of 7.0 g/dL. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Postoperative infection, other post-operative complications and Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment scores obtained at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year were compared for liberal and conservative transfusion thresholds. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients completed 1 year follow-up. There was a significant association between a liberal transfusion strategy and higher rate of infection (P = 0.01), with no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. This study was adequately powered at 92% to detect a difference in superficial infection (7% for liberal group, 0% for conservative, P < 0.01) but underpowered to detect a difference for deep infection (14% for liberal group, 6% for conservative group, P = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: A conservative transfusion threshold of 5.5 g/dL in an asymptomatic young trauma patient with associated musculoskeletal injuries leads to a lower infection rate without an increase in adverse outcomes and no difference in functional outcomes at 6 months or 1 year. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

Reference24 articles.

1. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion;Carson;Cochrane Database Syst Rev,2021

2. Is a restrictive transfusion strategy safe for resuscitated and critically ill trauma patients?;McIntyre;J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care,2004

3. Clinical practice guideline: red blood cell transfusion in adult trauma and critical care;Napolitano;J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care,2009

4. Anemia versus transfusion: does blood conservation increase the risk of complications?;Mullis;Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ),2015

5. Restrictive versus liberal transfusion strategy in upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a randomized controlled trial;Kola;Saudi J Gastroenterol.,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3