Early Treatment of Acetabular Fractures Using an Anterior Approach Increases Blood Loss but not Packed Red Blood Cell Transfusion

Author:

Mullis Brian H.12,Chang Joshua H.3,Shah Nihar4,Sabbagh Ramsey S.4,Yu Qing1,Archdeacon Michael T.4,Sagi H. Claude4,Natoli Roman M.12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN;

2. Indiana University Health Physicians, Indianapolis, IN;

3. Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN; and

4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine whether time from hospital admission to surgery for acetabular fractures using an anterior intrapelvic (AIP) approach affected blood loss. METHODS: Design: Retrospective review. Setting: Three level 1 trauma centers at 2 academic institutions. Patient Selection Criteria: Adult (18 years or older) patients with no pre-existing coagulopathy treated for an acetabular fracture via an AIP approach. Excluded were those with other significant same day procedures (irrigation and debridement and external fixation were the only other allowed procedures). Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Multiple methods for evaluating blood loss were investigated, including estimated blood loss (EBL), calculated blood loss (CBL) by Gross and Hgb balance methods, and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion requirement. Outcomes were evaluated based on time to surgery. RESULTS: 195 patients were studied. On continuous linear analysis, increasing time from admission to surgery was significantly associated with decreasing CBL at 24 hours (−1.45 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.003; −0.440 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.003) and 3 days (−1.69 mL per hour by Gross method, P = 0.013; −0.497 g of Hgb per hour by Hgb balance method, P = 0.010) postoperative, but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. Using 48 hours from admission to surgery to define early versus delayed surgery, CBL was significantly greater in the early group compared to the delayed group (453 [IQR 277–733] mL early versus 364 [IQR 160–661] delayed by Gross method, P = 0.017; 165 [IQR 99–249] g of Hgb early versus 143 [IQR 55–238] g Hgb delayed by Hgb balance method, P = 0.035), but not EBL or PRBC transfusion. In addition, in multivariate linear regression, neither giving tranexamic acid nor administering prophylactic anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism on the morning of surgery affected blood loss at 24 hours or 3 days postoperative (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: There was higher blood loss with early surgery using an AIP approach, but early surgery did not affect PRBC transfusion and may not be clinically relevant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Orthopedics and Sports Medicine,General Medicine,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3