Abstract
Purpose of review
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients sometimes do not respond to second-generation antihistamine, and 10–50% patients do not even respond to four-fold the usual dose of nonsedating H1 antihistamine, which further leads to repeated courses of oral corticosteroids to abate the symptoms. There are third-line agents approved by EAACI guidelines, which include omalizumab and cyclosporine. Certain patients are even resistant to the third-line agents. In this review, various other treatment options will be discussed in patients of refractory CSU.
Recent findings
Recently, we demonstrated azathioprine as a possible third-line option, which was found noninferior to cyclosporine in antihistamine refractory CSU. There have been trials, studies, case series and reports, which suggest other putative options for refractory CSU management.
Summary
Studies on the management of refractory CSU are accumulating thereby expanding the armamentarium of dermatologists and allergologist against difficult-to-treat urticaria patients.
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Reference22 articles.
1. The EAACI/GA(2) LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria: the 2013 revision and update;Zuberbier;Allergy,2014
2. The EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis and management of urticaria;Zuberbier;Allergy,2018
3. The natural history of chronic urticaria and angioedema in patients visiting a tertiary referral centre;van der Valk;Br J Dermatol,2002
4. The characteristics of urticaria in 390 patients;Humphreys;Br J Dermatol,1998
5. Azathioprine as a therapeutic alternative for refractory chronic urticaria;Tal;Int J Dermatol,2015