Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Studies

Author:

Hanline Mary Frances,Eldridge Jennifer Nicole,Robbins Audrey

Abstract

The purpose of this meta-synthesis was to integrate findings from qualitative research studying the experiences and outcomes of children when they participate in inclusive early childhood (EC) classrooms. The goal was to promote a broader understanding of practices and outcomes in inclusive EC programs. Eight primary studies were included in the meta-synthesis. Evaluation of the eight qualitative studies indicated that all utilized methods to establish trustworthiness and ensure rigorous methodology for the type of data collected, indicating high-quality of the studies. Three themes resulted from the systematic coding of the results of the primary studies. These themes related to the outcomes of children’s access to and full participation in inclusive EC programs, the formation of positive relationships and friendships between the children with and without disabilities as a result of interactions over time, and the children’s autonomy in social interactions as reflected in when, how, and with whom the children chose to interact. The results support that EC inclusion can result in positive outcomes for children and should be expanded as a service delivery model. Implications for future research and the provision of services are discussed.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference45 articles.

1. Advancing high-quality preschool inclusion: A discussion and recommendations for the field;Barton;Topics in Early Childhood Special Education,2015

2. Parents’ experiences navigating early intervention and early childhood special education services: A qualitative metasynthesis;Batz;Journal of Early Intervention,2024

3. Children’s perspectives on their relationships with friends with and without complex communication needs;Biggs;Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities,2020

4. Qualitative studies in special education;Brantlinger;Exceptional Children,2005

5. Access, participation, and supports: The defining features of high-quality inclusion;Buysse;Zero to Three,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3