A call for standardized reporting of early-onset colorectal peritoneal metastases

Author:

Austin-Datta Rebecca J.1,La Vecchia Carlo2,George Thomas J.3,Mohamed Faheez4,Boffetta Paolo56,Dineen Sean P.7,Huang Daniel Q.89,Vu Thanh-Huyen T.10,Nguyen Tin C.11,Permuth Jennifer B.12,Luu Hung N.13

Affiliation:

1. Department of Epidemiology, College of Medicine and College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

2. Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy

3. University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA

4. Peritoneal Malignancy Institute, Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital, Basingstoke, UK

5. Stony Brook Cancer Center, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA

6. Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

7. Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA

8. Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National University Hospital, Singapore

9. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California

10. Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois

11. Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada

12. Departments of Gastrointestinal Oncology and Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida and

13. Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center and Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, USA

Abstract

Background The incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients under 50 years of age, i.e., early-onset CRC, has increased in the past two decades. Colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) will develop in 10–30% of CRC patients. CPM traditionally had a dismal prognosis, but surgery and novel systemic treatments appear to increase survival. Determining potential age-associated risk and prognostic factors is optimized when analyses use standardized age groupings. Methods We performed a review of early-onset CPM studies and compared variables used, e.g., age stratification and definitions of synchronous and metachronous CPM. We included studies published in PubMed up to November 2022 if results were stratified by age. Results Of 114 screened publications in English, only 10 retrospective studies met inclusion criteria. Incidence of CPM was higher in younger CRC patients (e.g. 23% vs. 2% for <25 vs. ≥25 years, P < 0.0001; and 57% vs. 39% vs. 4% for <20 vs. 20–25 vs. >25 years, P < 0.001); two studies reported higher proportion of younger African American CPM patients (e.g. 16% vs. 6% for <50 vs. ≥50 years). Studies used seven different age-stratification methods, presenting comparison challenges. Conclusion Studies showed a higher proportion of CPM in younger patients, but directly comparing results was not possible due to inconsistent reporting. To better address this issue, CRC and CPM studies stratified by standard age groups (e.g. <50 vs. ≥50) are needed.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Cancer Research,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Oncology,Epidemiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3