Rhomboid intercostal block or thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative recovery quality after video-assisted thoracic surgery

Author:

Wang Xuru,Jia Xiaoyu,Li Zhenping,Zhou Qinghe

Abstract

BACKGROUND The analgesic characteristics of rhomboid intercostal block (RIB) remain unclear. Before it can be fully recommended, we compared the recovery quality and analgesic effects of RIB and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). OBJECTIVE The current study aimed to investigate whether there is a difference in postoperative recovery quality between TPVB and RIB. DESIGN A prospective, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. SETTING Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University in China from March 2021 to August 2022. PATIENTS Eighty patients aged 18 to 80 years, with ASA physical status I to III, and scheduled for elective VATS were enrolled in the trial. INTERVENTION Ultrasound-guided TPVB or RIB was performed with 20 ml 0.375% ropivacaine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome of the study was the mean difference of quality of recovery-40 scores 24 h postoperatively. The non-inferiority margin was defined as 6.3. Numeric rating scores (NRS) for pain at 0.5, 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively in all patients were also recorded. RESULTS A total of 75 participants completed the study. The mean difference of quality of recovery-40 scores 24 h postoperatively was −1.6 (95% CI, −4.5 to 1.3), demonstrating the non-inferiority of RIB to TPVB. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the area under the curve for pain NRS over time, at rest and on movement, at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h postoperatively (all P > 0.05), except for the area under the curve pain NRS over time on movement at 48 h postoperatively (P = 0.046). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in the postoperative sufentanil use at 0 to 24 h or 24 to 48 h (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION Our study suggests that RIB was non-inferior to TPVB for the quality of recovery, with almost the same postoperative analgesic effect as TPVB after VATS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION chictr.org.cn: ChiCTR2100043841.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3