Comparing Three-dimensional Radiologic Outcomes Between Early Versus Late Secondary Alveolar Bone Grafting

Author:

Lu Xuanyu1,Roohani Idean23ORCID,Manasyan Artur3,Stanton Eloise W.4,Youn Simon5,Hammoudeh Jeffrey A.245,Urata Mark M.245,Magee William P.24,Allareddy Veerasathpurush6,Yen Stephen L.1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Dentistry and Orthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles

2. Division of Plastic and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Surgery, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles

3. Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California

4. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine

5. Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Herman Ostrow School of Dentistry, Los Angeles, CA

6. Department of Orthodontics, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL

Abstract

Secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) during mixed dentition is the standard of care for patients with complete cleft of lip and palate. Early SABG (E-SABG; 4 to 7 y) occurs before the eruption of lateral incisors, whereas late SABG (L-SABG; 8 to 12 y) occurs before the eruption of maxillary permanent canines. This study compares outcomes of E-SABG versus L-SABG among patients with unilateral cleft of lip and palate (UCLP). A prospective cohort study was conducted evaluating nonsyndromic patients with UCLP who underwent SABG from April 2018 to January 2020, 48 consecutive patients with UCLP were included. Preoperative and 6 to 10-month postoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging were obtained to assess graft and periodontal outcomes. Among 48 patients with UCLP, of which 21 were in the E-SABG group (6.9 ± 1.1 y), and 28 were in the L-SABG cohort (10.4 ± 1.6 y). The initial alveolar cleft width is significantly smaller in the E-SABG cohort compared with the L-SABG cohort (5.1 ± 1.5 versus 6.5 ± 2.0 mm, P = 0.008). Compared with the L-SABG cohort, the E-SABG cohort had higher rates of bony bridge formation (77.3% versus 65.4%, P= 0.367), thicker bony bridges (5.7 ± 2.1 versus 3.9 ± 1.5 mm, P= 0.004), lower Bergland scores [1.5 (interquartile range: 1 to 2) versus 2.25 (interquartile range: 1.5 to 3.5), P= 0.026], and greater alveolar bone coverage (79.8 ± 16.7% versus 67.9 ± 18.1%, 0.024). The authors' findings suggest that patients who undergo E-SABG at ∼7 years may have better graft outcomes and benefits to the periodontal bone support on cleft-adjacent incisor compared with L-SABG at 11 years.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference41 articles.

1. Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006;Parker;Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol,2010

2. Cleft of lip and palate: a review;Vyas;J Family Med Prim Care,2020

3. Bone grafting for the alveolar cleft defect;Waite;Semin Orthod,1996

4. Secondary bone grafting of residual alveolar and palatal clefts;Boyne;J Oral Surg,1972

5. Elimination of the residual alveolar cleft by secondary bone grafting and subsequent orthodontic treatment;Bergland;Cleft Palate J,1986

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3