Comparison of Speech Outcomes Between Speech Therapy Only and Double-Opposing Z-Plasty Combined With Speech Therapy in Patients With Submucous Cleft Palate

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare speech outcomes in patients with submucous cleft palate (SMCP) between speech therapy alone and double-opposing Z-plasty (DOZ) combined with speech therapy. The subjects were 67 patients with SMCP (overt type, 45 males, 22 females), who were divided into the observation group (n=18), the speech therapy group (n=24; duration, 17.8 mo), and the DOZ and speech therapy (DOZ-speech therapy) group (n=25; median age at DOZ, 5.3 years, duration, 18.6 mo). The median age at initial and final speech assessments were 3 and 5 years. After age, sex, syndromic status, duration of speech therapy, surgery timing, and speech outcomes were investigated, statistical analysis was performed. After tailored interventions, both isolated and non-isolated SMCP patients experienced significant improvements in speech outcomes, including nasal emission, hypernasality, compensatory articulation, and unintelligible speech. Since comparable improvements were observed, there were no significant differences in the final assessments regardless of initial speech issues between the speech therapy group and the DOZ-speech therapy group (all P>0.05). In the DOZ-speech therapy group, the rate of achieving “socially acceptable” speech was 92.3% in isolated cases and 90% in non-isolated cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that DOZ showed a tendency to reduce hypernasality, compensatory articulation, and “unintelligible” speech; syndromic or developmental conditions influenced outcomes in nasal emission and hypernasality; and initial hypernasality and compensatory articulation were correlated with outcomes. Therefore, DOZ surgery could be recommended to resolve hypernasality and compensatory articulation in SMCP patients before speech issues worsen.