Cephalometric Comparison of Transgender Women Following Facial Feminization Surgery to Assigned Female at Birth Subjects

Author:

Rancu Albert L.,Flores-Pérez Paula,Kong Victoria,Vassallo Melanie A.,Allam Omar,Mukherjee Thayer,Alperovich Michael

Abstract

Objective: Facial feminization surgery (FFS) consists of a set of procedures utilized in gender-affirming care. With the goal of transforming masculine craniofacial features to more anthropomorphically feminine ones, these procedures are performed to increase congruence between the patient physical appearance and self-identified gender. However, the literature characterizing the femininity of FFS postoperative results is limited. The present study addresses the discrepancy through a three-dimensional cephalometric comparison. Methods: Patients who underwent frontal sinus setback, suprabrow contouring, genioplasty, and gonial angle reduction and received postoperative computed tomography imaging were identified. Craniofacial landmarks were placed to define regions of interest for cephalometric measurements including volume, surface area, and region-specific parameters. A set of control measurements was calculated for comparison from a cohort of 5 assigned female at birth (AFAB) subjects. Similarity of postoperative and AFAB measurements was calculated and compared for forehead, chin, and gonial angle procedures using analysis of variance and pairwise t test analysis. Results: Analysis of 80 FFS patients revealed that genioplasty had a significantly higher AFAB similarity score for surface area measurements than forehead procedures (P < 0.05). Genioplasty volume was significantly more similar to the AFAB parameter than the gonial angle reduction volume (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The present study, to our knowledge, is the most comprehensive and quantitative comparison of FFS postoperative results to AFAB subjects. Genioplasty had greater AFAB similarity than forehead and gonial angle reduction. Incongruencies between FFS and AFAB controls offer lessons for gender-affirming surgeons.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference23 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3