Extracapsular Dissection Versus Superficial Parotidectomy for Benign Parotid Tumors: A Bibliometric and Visual Analysis

Author:

Troise Stefania1,Calabria Federica1ORCID,Merola Raffaele2,Calvanese Carlo1,Arena Antonio1,Abbate Vincenzo1,Bonavolontà Paola1,Dell'Aversana Orabona Giovanni1

Affiliation:

1. Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II

2. Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy

Abstract

Utilizing data extracted from Scopus and Web of Science databases, all the publications comparing “Superficial Parotidectomy” AND “Extracapsular dissection” were considered. Original research, review articles, letters, and note articles were included. Data about publication frequency, language distribution, authorship patterns, co-occurrence of keywords, and citation counts were extracted. In addition, visual analysis techniques such as co-authorship, keyword co-occurrence and citation networks, and bibliographic coupling maps were employed to visualize relationships and patterns within the literature. From the Scopus database, a total of 152 records were identified and screened, resulting in the inclusion of 42 papers. The most cited paper (102 times) was published in Laryngoscope Journal. Bibliometric analysis of co-citation revealed 797 cited references and 1284 cited authors. From the Web of Science database, a total of 211 records were identified and screened, resulting in the inclusion of 28 papers. This study provides a deeper overview of the landscape surrounding the comparison between extracapsular dissection and superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid tumors and insights about research trends, collaboration patterns, and knowledge dissemination in this clinical area to facilitate evidence-based practice and guide future research.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3