Non-invasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in thoracic cancer surgery

Author:

Fellahi Jean-Luc,Abraham Paul,Tiberghien Nicolas,Coelembier Clément,Maury Jean-Michel,Bendjelid Karim

Abstract

BACKGROUND Patients scheduled for thoracic cancer surgery are eligible for goal-directed fluid therapy, but cardiac output monitoring remains challenging in that specific setting. OBJECTIVE We aimed to compare cardiac output as measured with chest bioreactance with that measured by calibrated pulse contour analysis; the hypothesis being that both methods would be interchangeable. DESIGN A prospective monocentre observational study. SETTING A tertiary university hospital. PATIENTS Fifty adult patients undergoing thoracic cancer surgery over a one year period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Simultaneous measurements of cardiac index (CI) with bioreactance (CI-NICOM) and arterial pulse contour analysis calibrated by transthoracic echocardiography (CI-PCA) were performed at eight pre-specified intra-operative time points and following fluid challenge and/or vasoactive agents. Relationships between absolute values and changes in CI were assessed by linear regression. Interchangeability was tested with Bland–Altman analysis and percentage error calculation. A four quadrant plot was used to evaluate trending ability. RESULTS There was a significant difference between CI-PCA and CI-NICOM: 2.4 ± 0.8 (range: 0.9 to 5.8) l min−1 m−2 vs. 2.9 ± 0.9 (range: 0.9 to 7.2) l min−1 m−2, respectively (P < 0.001). A positive relationship was found between both techniques: y = 0.29x + 2.19; r 2 = 0.08 (P < 0.001). Taking CI-PCA as the reference method, there was a systematic overestimation of CI-NICOM by 21% (0.5 l min−1 m−2) and limits of agreement were large: -2.49 to 1.47 l min−1 m−2. The percentage error was 77% and concordance rates were 75 and 70% with and without an exclusion zone of 0.5 l min−1 m−2. CONCLUSION Chest bioreactance is feasible and well tolerated in patients undergoing thoracic surgery for cancer. When compared with calibrated PCA over a wide range of CI values, the technique is moderately correlated, not interchangeable, and provides moderate trending ability. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT04251637.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3