Different behaviour of target-controlled infusion pumps despite apparently using the same Schnider pharmacokinetic model

Author:

Soehle Martin,Wolter Andreas,Thudium Marcus,Frede Stilla,Coburn Mark

Abstract

BACKGROUND Target-controlled infusion (TCI) pumps deliver an initial bolus of drug to achieve a preset drug target concentration quickly. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether differences exist in the initial bolus dose between different TCI pumps despite apparently using the same pharmacokinetic (PK) model. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING Laboratory data from a German University Hospital. Experiments were performed between February 2019 and September 2020. PARTICIPANTS Four TCI pumps set to the Schnider model in effect-site mode with a target propofol concentration of 3.5 μg ml−1 were studied. The algorithms of two pumps employed a fixed equilibration rate constant (k e0) of 0.456 min−1 (Perfusor® Space® and Injectomat TIVA Agilia®), while the other two used a fixed time to peak concentration (t peak) of 1.6 min (Alaris® PK and Syramed® μSP6000). Pump performance was assessed on 13 virtual patients with different combinations of age, sex, height and weight: the initial propofol dose injected was measured on a high precision scale. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Propofol bolus dose, as if delivered for anaesthesia induction. RESULTS A small difference in propofol bolus doses was observed for some simulations: for example, 56.4 ± 1.2 and 59.7 ± 0.2 mg with a Syramed μSP6000 and an Alaris pharmacokinetic pump, respectively, in a virtual 54-year old man with a height of 170 cm and a weight of 74 kg. In contrast, significant differences were found in other simulated patients: for example, 72.0 ± 1.0 and 111.9 ± 1.2 mg (P < 0.001) using a Perfusor Space and an Alaris TCI pump in a virtual 60-year-old, obese man with a height of 182 cm and a weight of 139 kg. CONCLUSIONS Discrepancies in the initial bolus dose can be explained by differences in k e0. Anaesthetists should be aware that differences exist in the implementation of the Schnider model between manufacturers, which could lead to disparities in the initial propofol bolus in some patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3