Variability of expert assessments of ECG time domain parameters

Author:

Böck Carl,Mörtl Christoph,Mahringer Christoph,Huemer Mario,Meier Jens

Abstract

BACKGROUND In anaesthesiology, time domain parameters of the ECG are frequently used for long QT diagnosis, determination of branch blocks and for identifying atrioventricular blocks. However, this analysis depends on several factors and therefore the time domain parameters are prone to variability. OBJECTIVE To determine the variability of expert assessments of ECG time domain parameters in daily clinical practice. DESIGN In an observational study 18 physicians labelled the onset, peak and end of the waves (P-QRS-T) for 26 preselected, distinctive beats. Based on this, clinically important durations and intervals were derived: the duration of the P wave, T wave and QRS complex, as well as the length of the PQ and QT interval. These parameters were subsequently analysed with respect to inter-expert variability (for all experts and discipline-based subgroups) and, additionally, were compared with computer-aided analysis. SETTING ECG recordings from participating patients were recorded in March 2015 during standard examination in the hospital and stored in the local ECG database. PATIENTS We did not define inclusion or exclusion criteria for the patients themselves; the ECG beats were selected by a medical expert with respect to their shapes and abnormalities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Variability of clinically relevant ECG wave durations and intervals quantified were expressed as the interquartile range and the Q2/Q98 span for 18 investigators. RESULTS The resulting wave durations (Pdur, QRSdur and Tdur) and intervals (PQ and QT) showed high variability, for instance, captured by the Q2/Q98 span ranging from 39 to 99 ms. CONCLUSION The observed, inter-investigator variability of assessing the PQ and QT intervals, as well as the wave durations, might result in important variance regarding ECG-associated diagnoses. Whether these variances play a major role in typical clinical situations would have to be demonstrated with further clinical observational studies.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3