Phase III Randomized Non-Inferiority Study of OSS Versus PEG + Electrolyte Colonoscopy Preparation in Adolescents

Author:

Socha Piotr1,Posovszky Carsten23,Szychta Monika1,Viscogliosi Federica4,Martemucci Luigi4,Grzybowska-Chlebowczyk Urszula45,Perrot Valerie6,Kornowski Anne7,Benninga Marc A.8,

Affiliation:

1. Children’s Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland

2. University-Children’s Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland

3. Department for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University Medical Center Ulm, Ulm, Germany

4. John Paul II Upper Silesian Child Health Centre, Katowice, Poland

5. Department of Paediatrics I, Faculty of Medical Science, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

6. Ipsen Pharma, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

7. Ipsen Consumer HealthCare, Boulogne-Billancourt, France

8. Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

Objectives: Many protocols and preparations are used for bowel cleansing before pediatric colonoscopy but few are based on scientific evidence. We evaluated efficacy, safety, tolerability, and patient preference of oral sulfate solution (OSS) at 75% of the adult dose versus polyethylene glycol (PEG)-electrolyte solution in adolescents presenting for diagnostic colonoscopy. Methods: Phase III, randomized, evaluator-blinded, non-inferiority study of OSS and PEG in adolescents aged 12–17 years. OSS and PEG were administered in 2 doses on the day before colonoscopy. Primary endpoint included proportion of patients with successful overall preparation (4-point scale). Secondary endpoints included overall and segmental bowel cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale; BBPS), completed colonoscopies, duration of examination, time to cecal intubation, proportion of nasogastric tubes (NGTs), adverse events (AEs) and acceptability. Results: Successful cleansing was achieved in 71.4% and 79.0% of patients receiving OSS and PEG, respectively [adjusted difference −7.61 (95% confidence interval, CI, −18.45 to 3.24); P = 0.0907]. Segmental BBPS score for the left and transverse colon were similar between treatment groups, but better for the right colon with PEG than OSS [2.2 (95% CI, 2.0–2.4) and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.7–2.1), respectively; P = 0.0015]. Significantly fewer OSS patients needed NGT placement to ingest the whole solution [9/125 (7.2%)] than PEG patients [36/116 (31.0%); P < 0.0001]. Treatment acceptability was significantly higher with OSS than PEG (P < 0.0001). Duration of examination, completed colonoscopies, and time to cecal intubation were similar between preparations. Gastrointestinal AEs including nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and distension were similar in both groups but more patients receiving PEG had AEs assessed as incapacitating. Conclusions: Non-inferiority of OSS to PEG was not demonstrated, but OSS was associated with a lower requirement for NGT, better acceptability, and less frequent severe AEs than with PEG.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Gastroenterology,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3