Evidence-Based Performance Measures for Reconstruction after Skin Cancer Resection: A Multidisciplinary Performance Measure Set

Author:

Chen Andrew1,Ray Peter2,Rogers Howard3,Bialowas Christie4,Butala Parag5,Chen Michael6,Daveluy Steven D.7,Davidson Caryn8,Faringer Paul9,Guarda Helena10,Kantor Jonathan11,Kaweski Susan12,Lawrence Naomi13,Lickstein David14,Lomax John15,Parra Sylvia16,Retson Nicholas17,Suryadevara Amar18,Smith Ryan19,Tollefson Travis T.20,Wisco Oliver J.21

Affiliation:

1. University of Connecticut

2. East Hills Professional Center and Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine

3. Advanced Dermatology

4. Albany Medical Center

5. Piedmont Plastic Surgery and Dermatology

6. Kaiser Permanente

7. Wayne State University Physician Group

8. American Society of Plastic Surgeons

9. Hawaii Permanente Medical Group

10. Plastic Surgery Specialists of Virginia

11. University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine

12. Aesthetic Arts Institute of Plastic Surgery

13. Cooper University Health Care

14. Lickstein Plastic Surgery

15. Soderstrom Skin Institute

16. Dermatology and Skin Surgery

17. Retson Plastic Surgery

18. SUNY Upstate Medical University

19. Rush University Medical Center

20. University of California, Davis, Health

21. Mystic Valley Dermatology.

Abstract

Background: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons commissioned the multidisciplinary Performance Measure Development Work Group on Reconstruction after Skin Cancer Resection to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing skin cancer reconstruction. Included stakeholders were the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the American Academy of Dermatology, the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery, the American College of Mohs Surgery, the American Society for Mohs Surgery, and a patient representative. Methods: Two outcome measures and five process measures were identified. The outcome measures included the following: (1) patient satisfaction with information provided by their surgeon before their facial procedure, and (2) postprocedural urgent care or emergency room use. The process measures focus on antibiotic stewardship, anticoagulation continuation and/or coordination of care, opioid avoidance, and verification of clear margins. Results: All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and Executive Committee, and the stakeholder societies. Conclusion: The work group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, Continuing Medical Education, Continuous Certification, Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality reporting programs.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3