Most Efficient and Meaningful Patient-Reported Appearance Assessment in Different Cleft Types and Age Groups with CLEFT-Q

Author:

Ombashi Saranda12,Kurniawan Melissa S. I. C.1,Koudstaal Maarten J.342,Allori Alexander C.5,Jansson Kristina26,Rogers-Vizena Carolyn R.7,Mathijssen Irene M. J.142,Klassen Anne F.8,Versnel Sarah L.142

Affiliation:

1. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

2. European Reference Network for Rare and/or Complex Craniofacial Anomalies and Ear, Nose, and Throat Disorders

3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Special Dental Care and Orthodontics

4. Dutch Craniofacial Center, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam

5. Department of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital & Children’s Health Center

6. Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Stockholm Craniofacial Team, Karolinska University Hospital

7. Department of Plastic and Oral Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital

8. Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University.

Abstract

Background: The CLEFT-Q, a questionnaire developed and validated specifically for cleft patients, contains seven appearance scales. The International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) has incorporated only some CLEFT-Q appearance scales in the Standard Set to minimize burden. This study evaluates which appearance scales provide the most meaningful information in the different cleft types at specific ages, for the most efficient cleft appearance outcome assessment. Methods: Within this international multicenter study, outcomes of the seven appearance scales were collected, either as part of the ICHOM Standard Set, or as part of the field test study performed to validate the CLEFT-Q. Analyses were performed in separate age groups and cleft types, and involved univariate regression analyses, trend analyses, t tests, correlations, and floor and ceiling effects. Results: A total of 3116 patients were included. Scores for most appearance scales showed a downward trend by age group, with the exception of the Teeth and Jaw scales. In all cleft types, several scales correlated strongly with each other. No floor effects were observed, but ceiling effects were found in several scales in different age groups, most often in the CLEFT-Q Jaw scale. Conclusions: A proposition for the most meaningful and efficient appearance outcome assessment in cleft patients is made. It was composed so that recommendations are of value for different cleft protocols and initiatives. Suggestions for the use of scales in the ICHOM Standard Set at different ages are given, and also from a clinical perspective. Use of the CLEFT-Q Scar, Lips, and Nose scales will provide additional relevant information.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3