Outcomes in Heart Transplant Recipients by Bridge to Transplant Strategy When Using the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System

Author:

Silvestry Scott1ORCID,Leacche Marzia2,Meyer Dan M.3,Shudo Yasuhiro4,Kawabori Masashi5,Mahesh Balakrishnan6,Zuckermann Andreas7,D’Alessandro David8,Schroder Jacob9

Affiliation:

1. From the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, AdventHealth Transplant Institute, Orlando, Florida

2. Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Corewell Health (Formerly Spectrum Health), Grand Rapids, Michigan

3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas

4. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California

5. Cardiovascular Center, Department of Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Boston Massachusetts

6. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Heart & Vascular Institute, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania

7. Department for Cardiac Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

8. Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

Abstract

The last several years have seen a rise in use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) to bridge heart transplant recipients. A controlled hypothermic organ preservation system, the SherpaPak Cardiac Transport System (SCTS), was introduced in 2018 and has grown in utilization with reports of improved posttransplant outcomes. The Global Utilization And Registry Database for Improved heArt preservatioN (GUARDIAN)-Heart registry is an international, multicenter registry assessing outcomes after transplant using the SCTS. This analysis examines outcomes in recipients bridged with various MCS devices in the GUARDIAN-Heart Registry. A total of 422 recipients with donor hearts transported using SCTS were included and identified. Durable ventricular assist devices (VADs) were used exclusively in 179 recipients, temporary VADs or intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) in 197, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in 14 recipients. Average ischemic times were over 3.5 hours in all cohorts. Severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) posttransplant increased across groups (4.5% VAD, 5.1% temporary support, 21.4% ECMO), whereas intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (18.2 days) and total hospital stay (39.4 days) was longer in the ECMO cohort than the VAD and IABP groups. A comparison of outcomes of MCS bridging in SCTS versus traditional ice revealed significantly lower rates of both moderate/severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and severe PGD in the SCTS cohort; however, upon propensity matching only the reductions in moderate/severe RV dysfunction were statistically significant. Use of SCTS in transplant recipients with various bridging strategies results in excellent outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Biomedical Engineering,General Medicine,Biomaterials,Bioengineering,Biophysics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3