Incidence of multiple organ failure in adult polytrauma patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Ting Ryan S.,Lewis Daniel P.,Yang Kevin X.,Nguyen Tam Anh,Sarrami Pooria,Daniel Lovana,Hourigan Samuel,King Kate,Lassen Christine,Sarrami Mahsa,Ridley William,Alkhouri Hatem,Dinh Michael,Balogh Zsolt J.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Postinjury multiple organ failure (MOF) is the leading cause of late death in trauma patients. Although MOF was first described 50 years ago, its definition, epidemiology, and change in incidence over time are poorly understood. We aimed to describe the incidence of MOF in the context of different MOF definitions, study inclusion criteria, and its change over time. METHODS Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched for articles published between 1977 and 2022 in English and German. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed when applicable. RESULTS The search returned 11,440 results, of which 842 full-text articles were screened. Multiple organ failure incidence was reported in 284 studies that used 11 unique inclusion criteria and 40 MOF definitions. One hundred six studies published from 1992 to 2022 were included. Weighted MOF incidence by publication year fluctuated from 11% to 56% without significant decrease over time. Multiple organ failure was defined using four scoring systems (Denver, Goris, Marshall, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA]) and 10 different cutoff values. Overall, 351,942 trauma patients were included, of whom 82,971 (24%) developed MOF. The weighted incidences of MOF from meta-analysis of 30 eligible studies were as follows: 14.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 12.1–17.2%) in Denver score >3, 12.7% (95% CI, 9.3–16.1%) in Denver score >3 with blunt injuries only, 28.6% (95% CI, 12–45.1%) in Denver score >8, 25.6% (95% CI, 10.4–40.7%) in Goris score >4, 29.9% (95% CI, 14.9–45%) in Marshall score >5, 20.3% (95% CI, 9.4–31.2%) in Marshall score >5 with blunt injuries only, 38.6% (95% CI, 33–44.3%) in SOFA score >3, 55.1% (95% CI, 49.7–60.5%) in SOFA score >3 with blunt injuries only, and 34.8% (95% CI, 28.7–40.8%) in SOFA score >5. CONCLUSION The incidence of postinjury MOF varies largely because of lack of a consensus definition and study population. Until an international consensus is reached, further research will be hindered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Systematic Review and Meta-analysis; Level III.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Surgery

Reference118 articles.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3