Robotic-Assisted In-Bed Mobilization in Ventilated ICU Patients With COVID-19: An Interventional, Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study (ROBEM II Study)

Author:

Lorenz Marco12,Baum Felix1,Kloss Philipp1,Langer Nadine1,Arsene Vanessa1,Warner Linus1,Panelli Alessandro1,Hartmann Frederike V.1,Fuest Kristina2,Grunow Julius J.1,Enghard Philipp3,Schaller Stefan J.12

Affiliation:

1. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine (CCM/CVK), Berlin, Germany.

2. Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Health, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Munich, Germany.

3. Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin und Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted global healthcare systems, particularly in managing critically ill mechanically ventilated patients. This study aims to assess the feasibility of robotic-assisted mobilization in COVID-19 patients. Design: Randomized controlled pilot study. Setting: Four COVID-19 specialized ICUs at Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin (March 2021 to February 2022). Patients: Twenty critically ill COVID-19 patients expected to require greater than 24 hours of ventilation. Interventions: A 5-day intervention phase with bid robotic-assisted mobilization greater than or equal to 20 minutes and follow-up at day 180, compared with standard care. Measurements and Main Results: Intervention sessions were conducted in 98.9% according to protocol, with one session missing due to staff shortage. Primary outcome was the mobilization level measured with the ICU Mobility Scale (IMS) and Surgical ICU Optimal Mobilization Score (SOMS), assessed until day 5 or extubation. Safety events were recorded during mobilization. The median IMS and SOMS were 0 (0–0.16) and 1 (1–1.03) in the intervention group, and 0 (0–0.15) (p = 0.77) and 0.8 (0.65–1.20) (p = 0.08) in the standard care group, respectively. Significant secondary outcomes included average number of mobilization sessions (intervention: 8.5 [7.75–10] vs. standard care: 4.5 [3.5–5]; p = 0.001), total mobilization time (intervention: 232.5 min [187.25–266.5 min] vs. standard care: 147.5 min [107.5–167.5 min]; p = 0.011), and healthcare providers per session (intervention: 2 [2–2] vs. standard care: 1 [1–1.4]; p = 0.001) during intervention. Four safety events (hypertension and agitation, n = 2 each) in the intervention group and none in the standard care group were reported. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted mobilization in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients appears to be safe and feasible.

Funder

Reactive Robotics GmbH

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3