Moderate IV Fluid Resuscitation Is Associated With Decreased Sepsis Mortality

Author:

Corl Keith A.1,Levy Mitchell M.2,Holder Andre L.34,Douglas Ivor S.5,Linde-Zwirble Walter T.6,Alam Aftab7

Affiliation:

1. Division of Pulmonary Critical Care, Kaiser Permanente, Modesto, CA.

2. Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.

3. Department of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

4. Emory Critical Care Center, Atlanta, GA.

5. Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz School of Medicine, Aurora, CO.

6. ZD Associates LLC, Perkasie, PA.

7. Baxter International, Deerfield, IL.

Abstract

Objectives: Significant practice variation exists in the amount of resuscitative IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. Current research suggests equipoise between a tightly restrictive or more liberal strategy but data is lacking on a wider range of resuscitation practices. We sought to examine the relationship between a wide range of fluid resuscitation practices and sepsis mortality and then identify the primary driver of this practice variation. Design: Retrospective analysis of the Premier Healthcare Database. Setting: Six hundred twelve U.S. hospitals. Patients: Patients with sepsis and septic shock admitted from the emergency department to the ICU from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2019. Interventions: The volume of resuscitative IV fluid administered before the end of hospital day- 1 and mortality. Measurements and Main Results: In total, 190,682 patients with sepsis and septic shock were included in the analysis. Based upon patient characteristics and illness severity, we predicted that physicians should prescribe patients with sepsis a narrow mean range of IV fluid (95% range, 3.6–4.5 L). Instead, we observed wide variation in the mean IV fluids administered (95% range, 1.7–7.4 L). After splitting the patients into five groups based upon attending physician practice, we observed patients in the moderate group (4.0 L; interquartile range [IQR], 2.4–5.1 L) experienced a 2.5% reduction in risk-adjusted mortality compared with either the very low (1.6 L; IQR, 1.0–2.5 L) or very high (6.1 L; IQR, 4.0–9.0 L) fluid groups p < 0.01). An analysis of within- and between-hospital IV fluid resuscitation practices showed that physician variation within hospitals instead of practice differences between hospitals accounts for the observed variation. Conclusions: Individual physician practice drives excess variation in the amount of IV fluid given to patients with sepsis. A moderate approach to IV fluid resuscitation is associated with decreased sepsis mortality and should be tested in future randomized controlled trials.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3