Gastroenterologist focus of clinical practice affects adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy

Author:

Razjouyan Hadie1ORCID,Kim Myunghoon1,Levenick John1,Clarke Kofi1,McGarrity Thomas1

Affiliation:

1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State University, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA.

Abstract

Our objective was to determine whether the clinical focus of gastroenterology practice would affect screening colonoscopy quality metrics, specifically adenoma detection (AD). In a retrospective study of screening colonoscopies, gastroenterologists were categorized based on their clinical subspecialty focus into general/motility, hepatology, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and interventional endoscopy. The primary outcome was AD with a secondary outcome of adenoma and/or sessile serrated polyp (SSP) detection (AD + SSP). A total of 5271 (male: 49.1%) complete colonoscopies were performed between 2010 and 2020 by 16 gastroenterologists (male: 62.5%, general/motility specialists: 3, hepatologists: 3, IBD specialists: 4, interventional endoscopists: 6). The AD and AD + SSP rate between each specialty focus were 27.5% and 31.0% for general/motility, 31.4% and 35.5% for hepatology, 38.4% and 43.6% for IBD, and 37.5% and 43.2% for interventional endoscopy. In regression analysis, patient’s male gender (odds ratios [OR]: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.60–2.05, P < .001), longer withdrawal time (OR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.14–1.18, P < .001), hepatologist (OR: 1.25, 95% CI: 1.02–1.53, P = .029), IBD subspecialist (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.30–1.98, P < .001), and interventional endoscopist (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.13–1.64, P < .001) were independently associated with AD. Moreover, patient’s male gender (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.45–1.85, P < .001), acceptable bowel preparation (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.06–1.56, P = .010), withdrawal time (1.20, 95% CI: 1.18–1.22, P < .001), hepatologist (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.07–1.59, P = .008), IBD subspecialist (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.39–2.12, P < .001), interventional endoscopist (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.20–1.72, P < .001) were independent factors that improved detection of AD + SSP. Subspecialty focus of practice was an important factor in AD rate along with the male gender of the patient, bowel preparation, and withdrawal time.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Cancer statistics, 2021.;Siegel;CA Cancer J Clin,2021

2. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer: incidence, mortality, survival, and risk factors.;Rawla;Prz Gastroenterol,2019

3. Multilevel small-area estimation of colorectal cancer screening in the United States.;Berkowitz;Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev,2018

4. Global surveillance of cancer survival 1995-2009: analysis of individual data for 25,676,887 patients from 279 population-based registries in 67 countries (CONCORD-2).;Allemani;Lancet,2015

5. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes.;Schreuders;Gut,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3