Utilization of intense pulsed light for hair removal in pediatric auricular reconstruction using tissue expander: A retrospective cohort study

Author:

Liu Ying1ORCID,Huang LvPing2,Feng Yongqiang2,Huo Menghua2,Lin Lin2,Zhang Ling1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Plastic Surgery Department, Beijing Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Beijing, China

2. Laser Treatment Center, Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of depilation with intense pulsed light (IPL) in congenital microtia patients during their reconstruction treatment. The hairy skin was treated with the M22TM system (Lumenis, German) using a filter of 695 to 1200 mm. A contact prob with a window of 15 cm × 35 mm or 8 cm × 15 mm was used at a radiant setting of 14 to 15 J/cm2 in the non-expander group and 13 to 14 J/cm2 in the expander group, both in a single pulse mode. The efficiency index of hair removal was classified based on the percentage of hair density reduction as excellent (>75%), good (50–75%), fair (25–50%), poor (<25%). The depilation effect was compared between the 2 groups, and any adverse effects were evaluated. A total of 159 patients were included, with 93 patients in the expander group and 66 in the non-expander group. The reduction of the hair density in the expander group after 3 treatments was higher than that in the non-expander group [82.98 (73.47–89.09)% vs 77.84 (71.50–85.34)%; P < .05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test], as well as the efficiency [excellent cases 68 (73.12%) vs 37 (56.06%); P < .05, Chi-square test]. Four cases of folliculitis, 3 cases of blisters, and no instance of expander exposure and cartilage absorption were observed in this study. Hair removal with IPL is a safe and effective photo-epilation method during all stages of ear reconstruction using tissue expander. Depilation in the skin expansion period resulted in better outcomes after 3 treatments, although after 5 treatments no difference between the 2 groups was observed.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3