Physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding fibromyalgia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies

Author:

Agarwal Arnav123,Emary Peter C.345ORCID,Gallo Lucas6,Oparin Yvgeniy37,Shin Sae Ha8,Fitzcharles Mary-Ann9,Adachi Jonathan D.10,Cooper Matthew D.11,Craigie Samantha4,Rai Arjun5,Wang Li7,Couban Rachel J.4,Busse Jason W.2347

Affiliation:

1. School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

2. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

3. Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

4. Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

5. Department of Chiropractic, D’Youville University, Buffalo, NY

6. Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

7. Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

8. Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

9. McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

10. Hamilton Arthritis Centre, St. Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

11. Department of Rheumatology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Abstract

Background: The diagnosis, etiology, and optimal management of fibromyalgia remains contentious. This uncertainty may result in variability in clinical management. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cross-sectional studies examining physicians’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding fibromyalgia. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed from inception to February 2023 for cross-sectional surveys evaluating physicians’ attitudes toward, and management of, fibromyalgia. Pairs of independent reviewers conducted article screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment in duplicate. We used random-effects meta-analysis to pool proportions for items reported by more than one study and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach to summarize the certainty of evidence. Results: Of 864 citations, 21 studies (8904 participants) were eligible for review. Most physicians endorsed fibromyalgia as a distinct clinical entity (84%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 74–92), and half (51%; 95% CI, 40–62) considered fibromyalgia a psychosocial condition. Knowledge of formal diagnostic criteria for fibromyalgia was more likely among rheumatologists (69%, 95% CI, 45–89) versus general practitioners (38%, 95% CI, 24–54) (P = .04). Symptom relief was endorsed as the primary management goal by most physicians (73%, 95% CI, 52–90). Exercise, physiotherapy, antidepressants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and non-opioid analgesics were most endorsed for management of fibromyalgia, but with wide variability between surveys. Opioids and most complementary and alternative interventions (e.g., homeopathy, chiropractic, and massage) received limited endorsement. Conclusion: There is moderate certainty evidence to suggest that physicians are divided regarding whether fibromyalgia is a biomedical or psychosocial disorder. Physicians typically prioritize symptom relief as the primary goal of management, and often endorse management with exercise, non-opioid analgesics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antidepressants, and physiotherapy (moderate to high certainty evidence); however, important practice variation exists.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3