Pressure algometry in the general adult population: Age and sex differences

Author:

Vesal Mina1,Roohafza Hamidreza2ORCID,Feizi Awat3,Asgari Karim1,Shahoon Hassan4,Ani Alireza5,Adibi Peyman4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran

2. Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

3. Epidemiology and Biostatistics Department, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

4. Gastroenterology and Hepatology Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

5. Department of Bioinformatics, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Abstract

Experimental pain studies have revealed inter-individual variations in pain perception that are influenced by age, sex, and country of origin. This study aimed to explore the age and sex differences in pressure pain thresholds within the Iranian general population. To assess the pressure pain thresholds, a handheld pressure algometer was applied bilaterally to the middle fingers of both hands. The participants also completed the short form of the McGill Pain Questionnaire to provide a clinical pain rating. This cross-sectional study included 1610 adult subjects (54.96% female, mean age 40.13 ± 10.18 years). The findings indicated that females generally exhibited lower pain thresholds than males when assessing pain detection and tolerance parameters (P < .001). Females also demonstrated a significant lower pressure thresholds and clinical pain ratings compared with men (P < .001). Additionally, significant differences were observed between age groups in terms of pain detection and tolerance thresholds (P = .02 and P = .03, respectively). However, the interaction between sex and age was not significant. No significant differences in pain detection thresholds were observed between the right and left hand (P = .11). This study underscores the potential utility of algometry as a valuable tool for objectifying pain in the Iranian population.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Reference88 articles.

1. What are the most common conditions in primary care? Systematic review.;Finley;Can Fam Physician,2018

2. Assessing pain research: a narrative review of emerging pain methods, their technosocial implications, and opportunities for multidisciplinary approaches.;Berger;Front Pain Res,2022

3. Instruments to measure acute pain: an integrative review.;Riddle;J Pain Manage,2013

4. Prevalence of chronic pain in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.;Jackson;Lancet,2015

5. Prevalence of chronic pain in developing countries: systematic review and meta-analysis.;Sá;Pain Rep,2019

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3