Centralization and democratization: Managing crisis communication in health care delivery

Author:

Hayirli Tuna C.,Stark Nicholas,Hardy James,Peabody Christopher R.,Kerrissey Michaela J.

Abstract

Background Communication is an essential organizational process for responding to adversity. Managers are often advised to communicate frequently and redundantly during crises. Nonetheless, systematic investigation of how information receivers perceive organizational communication amid crises has remained lacking. Purpose The aim of this study was to characterize features of effective internal crisis communication by examining how information-sharing processes unfolded during the initial stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methodology Between June and August 2020, we conducted 55 semistructured interviews with emergency department workers practicing in a variety of roles. We analyzed interview transcripts following constructivist constant comparative methods. Results Our findings revealed that at the onset of COVID-19 pandemic response, emergency department workers struggled with immense fear and anxiety amid high uncertainty and equivocality. Frequent and redundant communication, however, resulted in information delivery and uptake problems, worsening anxiety, and interpersonal tension. These problems were ameliorated by the emergence of contextual experts who centralized and democratized communication. Centralization standardized information received across roles, work schedules, and settings while decoupling internal communication from turbulence in the environment. Democratization made information accessible in a way that all could understand. It also ensured information senders’ receptiveness to feedback from information receivers. Centralization and democratization together worked to reduce sensed uncertainty and equivocality, which reduced anxiety and interpersonal tension. Conclusion Establishing frequent and redundant communication strategies does not necessarily address the anxiety and interpersonal tension produced by uncertainty and equivocality in crises. Practice Implications Centralization and democratization of crisis communication can reduce anxiety, improve coordination, and promote a safer workplace and patient care environment.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Strategy and Management,Health Policy,Leadership and Management

Reference36 articles.

1. Moving forward from COVID-19: Organizational dimensions of effective hospital emergency management;Health Security,2021

2. Sending and receiving safety and risk messages in hospitals: An exploration into organizational communication channels and providers’ communication overload;Health Communication,2021

3. Communication overload in hospitals: Exploring organizational safety communication, worker job attitudes, and communication efficacy;Health Communication,2022

4. Keeping pace: An ED communications strategy for COVID-19;The American Journal of Emergency Medicine,2020

5. The dark side of information: Overload, anxiety and other paradoxes and pathologies;Journal of Information Science,2009

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Challenges and Solutions to Patient Safety During a Pandemic;Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America;2024-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3