Sedation Research in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients: Proposals for Future Study Design From the Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research IV Workshop

Author:

Jackson Shawn S.1,Lee Jennifer J.2,Jackson William M.3,Price Jerri C.2,Beers Sue R.4,Berkenbosch John W.5,Biagas Katherine V.6,Dworkin Robert H.7,Houck Constance S.1,Li Guohua8,Smith Heidi A. B.9,Ward Denham S.7,Zimmerman Kanecia O.10,Curley Martha A. Q.11,Horvat Christopher M.12,Huang David T.13,Pinto Neethi P.14,Salorio Cynthia F.15,Slater Rebeccah16,Slomine Beth S.17,West Leanne L.18,Wypij David19,Yeates Keith O.20,Sun Lena S.21

Affiliation:

1. Departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA.

2. Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.

3. Department of Anesthesiology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY.

4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA.

5. Department of Pediatrics, University of Louisville, Norton Children’s Hospital, Louisville, KY.

6. Department of Pediatrics, The Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY.

7. Departments of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

8. Department of Anesthesiology, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY.

9. Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.

10. Department of Pediatrics, Duke University, Durham, NC.

11. School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

12. Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Pediatrics and Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

13. Departments of Critical Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

14. Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA.

15. Department of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

16. Department of Paediatric Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.

17. Center for Brain Injury Recovery, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

18. International Children’s Advisory Network, Atlanta, GA.

19. Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

20. Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

21. Departments of Pediatrics and Anesthesiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Sedation and analgesia for infants and children requiring mechanical ventilation in the PICU is uniquely challenging due to the wide spectrum of ages, developmental stages, and pathophysiological processes encountered. Studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of sedative and analgesic management in pediatric patients have used heterogeneous methodologies. The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research (SCEPTER) IV hosted a series of multidisciplinary meetings to establish consensus statements for future clinical study design and implementation as a guide for investigators studying PICU sedation and analgesia. DESIGN: Twenty-five key elements framed as consensus statements were developed in five domains: study design, enrollment, protocol, outcomes and measurement instruments, and future directions. SETTING: A virtual meeting was held on March 2–3, 2022, followed by an in-person meeting in Washington, DC, on June 15–16, 2022. Subsequent iterative online meetings were held to achieve consensus. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one multidisciplinary, international participants from academia, industry, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and family members of PICU patients attended the virtual and in-person meetings. Participants were invited based on their background and experience. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Common themes throughout the SCEPTER IV consensus statements included using coordinated multidisciplinary and interprofessional teams to ensure culturally appropriate study design and diverse patient enrollment, obtaining input from PICU survivors and their families, engaging community members, and using developmentally appropriate and validated instruments for assessments of sedation, pain, iatrogenic withdrawal, and ICU delirium. CONCLUSIONS: These SCEPTER IV consensus statements are comprehensive and may assist investigators in the design, enrollment, implementation, and dissemination of studies involving sedation and analgesia of PICU patients requiring mechanical ventilation. Implementation may strengthen the rigor and reproducibility of research studies on PICU sedation and analgesia and facilitate the synthesis of evidence across studies to improve the safety and quality of care for PICU patients.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3