Affiliation:
1. Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Abstract
Protected areas (PAs) have long been criticized as creations of and for an elite few, where associated costs, but few benefits, are borne by marginalized rural communities. Contrary to predictions of this argument, we found that average human population growth rates on the borders of 306 PAs in 45 countries in Africa and Latin America were nearly double average rural growth, suggesting that PAs attract, rather than repel, human settlement. Higher population growth on PA edges is evident across ecoregions, countries, and continents and is correlated positively with international donor investment in national conservation programs and an index of park-related funding. These findings provide insight on the value of PAs for local people, but also highlight a looming threat to PA effectiveness and biodiversity conservation.
Publisher
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
Reference30 articles.
1. U.N. Environment Programme (UNEP)–World Conservation and Monitoring Center (WCMC) and IUCN World Database on Protected Areas [IUCN–World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA)/UNEP-WCMC Washington DC 2003]; available at www.unep-wcmc.org/wdpa/ (accessed September 2007).
2. Biodiversity Conservation and the Eradication of Poverty
3. M. M. Cernea, K. Schmidt-Soltau, World Dev.34, 1808 (2006).
4. N. L. Peluso, Glob. Environ. Change3, 199 (1993).
5. Can Protected Areas Contribute to Poverty Reduction? Opportunities and Limitations 2004
Cited by
513 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献