Current state of evidence-based practice in clinical physiotherapy
Affiliation:
1. University of the Witwatersrand
Abstract
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is a process that a clinician undertakes, implementing his or her clinical expertise while collaborating with the patient or client in the sociocultural context of care using the best available research evidence to inform practice. The approach has evolved over time in relation to its name, definition, scope and specific steps. In October 2001, member organisations of World Physiotherapy (then the World Confederation for Physical Therapy) gathered in London to discuss the status of EBP in the profession and to gain buy-in from regions to ensure that EBP would become a culture of practice in all regions. The purpose of this article is to describe the current state of EBP during physiotherapy as presented in the literature. Two decades have passed since this meeting, with noteworthy developments in clinical practice, education and research synthesis. Physiotherapists’ opinions and attitudes towards EBP are favourable but do not always ensure good implementation and execution during clinical practice. Standardised outcome measures to evaluate the EBP of physiotherapists are available. Barriers remain, which are multifactorial, and facilitators such as time, support and education are integral to optimise implementation. The launch of the Physiotherapy Evidence Database is one strategy that facilitates EBP in physiotherapy.
Clinical implications: A culture of EBP exists upon reflection of published literature from different world regions. Consistent, quality implementation of EBP, including shared decision making with patients and evaluation of evidence implemented during clinical practice remain necessary.
Reference39 articles.
1. Abdu, S.I., Maikarfe, A.H., Gambo, H.B., Tanko, I.M. & Sani, F. S., 2024, ‘Chapter 2: Clinical measurement as a resource for evidence-based practice in physiotherapy’, in H. Nakano (ed.), Physical therapy towards evidence-based practice, pp. 1–13, IntechOpen, London. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.111144 2. Alshehri, M.A., Alalawi, A., Alhasan, H. & Stokes, E., 2017, ‘Physiotherapists’ behaviour, attitudes, awareness, knowledge and barriers in relation to evidence-based practice implementation in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study’, JBI Evidence Implementation 15(3), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000106 3. Balzer, J., Jung, A., Gerhard, J., Reinecke, S., Mijic, M., Fichtmüller, A. et al., 2023, ‘Psychometric properties of questionnaires to assess evidence-based practice among occupational, physical and speech therapists: A systematic review’, Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen 176, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.zefq.2022.11.003 4. Chaturvedi, R., Khrolia, S., Yadav, V. & Bagri, M., 2021, ‘Knowledge, attitude and implementation of evidence-based practice of physiotherapists in India: A web-based cross-sectional study’, Romanian Journal of Neurology 20(2), 228–232. https://doi.org/10.37897/RJN.2021.2.16 5. Condon, C., McGrane, N., Mockler, D. & Stokes, E., 2016, ‘Ability of physiotherapists to undertake evidence-based practice steps: A scoping review’, Physiotherapy 102(1), 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2015.06.003
|
|