Bald and Bad?

Author:

Kranz Dirk1,Nadarevic Lena2,Erdfelder Edgar2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, University of Trier, Germany

2. Department of Psychology, University of Mannheim, Germany

Abstract

Abstract. According to (a) the beauty ideal of a full head of hair and (b) the physical attractiveness stereotype (PAS; “what is beautiful is good”), bald men should appear less attractive than nonbald men, not only physically but also socially. To explain inconsistent results on this prediction in previous research, we suggest two antagonistic processes: the automatic activation of the PAS at the implicit level and its suppression at the explicit level, the latter process selectively triggered by individuating information about the target person. In line with this account, we only found negative social attractiveness ratings for bald men by same-aged women when individuating target information was lacking (Experiment 1). In contrast, irrespective of whether individuating information was available or not, we reliably found evidence for the PAS in different implicit paradigms (the implicit association test in Experiment 2 and a source monitoring task in Experiment 3). We conclude that individuating information about bald men suppresses PAS application, but not PAS activation.

Publisher

Hogrefe Publishing Group

Subject

General Psychology,Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,General Medicine

Reference89 articles.

1. Banaji, M. R. & Greenwald, A. G. (1994). Implicit stereotyping and prejudice. In M. P. Zanna, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 7, pp. 55–76). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

2. Batchelder, W. H. & Batchelder, E. (2008). Meta-cognitive guessing strategies in source monitoring. In J. Dunlosky, & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 211–244). New York, NY: Psychology Press.

3. Multinomial processing models of source monitoring.

4. Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3