COMPONENTS OF GEOGRAPHICAL PRACTICE POWER COMPETENCY (GPPC) FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS: CONCEPTUALIZATION, CONTEXTS, AND CONTENT

Author:

Xu Yanhua1ORCID,Liu Zile2ORCID,Lin Peiying2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Jiangxi Normal University, China

2. Capital Normal University, China

Abstract

Geographical practice power is a key competency essential for students' overall development. It is, therefore, important to understand its concepts, contexts, and content. Practical activities following scientific and operable principles in real geographical situations would enable students to unleash their potential across the curriculum. The primary aim of this study was to design and validate a conceptual, contextual, and content framework for geographical practice power competency (GPPC) of primary and secondary school students in China. The study used a three-step mixed-method research design with expert opinions collected through interviews and questionnaires. The dimensions of GPPC in this study included the mental processes of cognition, awareness, attitude, and behavior. A compilation of the attributes of GPPC for primary and secondary school students was proposed. There was a general consensus among the evaluators regarding the conceptual, contextual, and content framework of GPPC. When the weight values of the four dimensions and sub-dimensions of GPPC were calculated, it was found that they played different roles in the framework. Contrary to the expectation that scientific argumentation would be the most important dimension of GPPC, this study found that information acquisition was rated the most important. In each GPPC sub-dimension, consciousness received the highest weighting. Keywords: geographical practice power competency, primary school students, secondary school students

Publisher

Scientia Socialis Ltd

Subject

Education

Reference50 articles.

1. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2015). The Australian curriculum. https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au

2. Geographical expeditions: Field work for the elementary grades;Boehm;Journal of Geography,1974

3. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1997). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Allyn & Bacon.

4. CGE, I. (1992). International charter on geographical education. International Geographical Union, Commission on Geographical Education.

5. Chen, G. (1981). Fieldwork and writing in human geography. Taiwan Normal University.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3