Effects of Couple-based Interventions on Psychological Outcomes among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author:

Thana Kanjana1,Miller Megan2,Chintanawat Rojanee1,Reangsing Chuntana3

Affiliation:

1. Chiang Mai University

2. University of Wisconsin–Madison

3. Mae Fah Luang University

Abstract

Abstract Objective: Cancer and its treatment can generate substantial psychological distress (depression and anxiety). The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to explore the effectiveness of couples-based interventions on psychological outcomes among people with cancer, and to test subgroup analyses to explore sources of heterogeneity affecting effect sizes. Design: Systematic searching across eight databases identified studies related to couples-based interventions for psychological outcomes of cancer patients published between 2007–2022. Rigorous inclusion and exclusion criteria were utilized. Random-effects models were used to compute effect sizes with Hedge’s g, forest plot, and Q and I2 statistics to measure heterogeneity. Moderator analyses were examined. Results: Twelve primary studies were identified (938 participants, 56.14±7.29 years old). Overall, couples-based interventions significantly improved depression (g=.36 95% confidence interval .03 to .68, I2=76%) and anxiety (g=.29, 95% confidence interval 0.14 to .45, I2=0%) compared to controls. With subgroup analyses, fidelity of couple-based intervention, number of weeks across intervention, and timing of outcome assessment (number of days post- intervention) were moderators affecting effect sizes. Discussion: Couples-based interventions appear to be effective among adults with cancer. Additional research is needed to explore the efficacy of couple-based interventions among more diverse samples, and to examine routes for integrating couple-based interventions into practice. PROSPERO registration id: CRD42023389697

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference39 articles.

1. World Health Organization. (2023). The top 10 causes of death. https://www.who.int/newsroom/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death

2. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries;Sung H;CA: a cancer journal for clinicians,2021

3. The moderating role of social support on depression and anxiety for gastric cancer patients and their family caregivers;Jeong A;PloS one,2017

4. Informal caregiver burden for solid tumour cancer patients: a review and future directions;Thana K;Psychology & Health,2021

5. Trajectories of depressed mood and anxiety during chemotherapy for breast cancer;Whisenant M;Cancer Nursing,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3