Affiliation:
1. Medical College of Wisconsin
2. Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin
Abstract
Abstract
Background:In clinical and research settings, hand dexterity is often assessed as finger individuation, or the ability to move one finger at a time. Despite its clinical importance, there is currently no standardized, sufficiently sensitive, or fully objective platform for these evaluations.Methods:Here we developed two novel individuation scores and tested them against a previously developed score (1) using a commercially available instrumented glove and data collected from 20 healthy adults. Participants performed individuation for each finger of each hand as well as whole hand open-close at two study visits separated by several weeks. Using the three individuation scores, intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC’s) and minimal detectable changes (MDC) were calculated. Individuation scores were further correlated with subjective assessments to assess validity.Results:We found that each score emphasizes different aspects of individuation performance while generating scores on the same scale (0 [poor] to 1 [ideal]). These scores are repeatable, but the quality of these metrics vary by both equation and finger of interest. For example, index finger intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC’s) were 0.90 (< 0.0001), 0.77 ([< 0.001), and 0.83 (p < 0.0001), while pinky finger ICC’s were 0.96 (p < 0.0001), 0.88 (p < 0.0001), and 0.81 (p < 0.001) for each score. Similarly, MDCs also vary by both finger and equation. In particular, thumb MDCs were 0.068, 0.14, and 0.045, while index MDCs were 0.041, 0.066, and 0.078. Furthermore, objective measurements correlated with subjective assessments of finger individuation quality for all three equations (ρ=-0.45, p < 0.0001; ρ=-0.53, p < 0.0001; ρ=-0.40, p < 0.0001).Conclusions:Here we evaluate the nuances of each objective scoring system and discuss ideal translational applications into motor physiology and rehabilitations labs, orthopedic hand and neurosurgery clinics, and even operating rooms for real-time objective scoring during peripheral nerve and awake brain operations for each equation. This work represents the first healthy participant data set for this translatable and objective measurement and scoring platform.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference49 articles.
1. Thielbar KO, Lord TJ, Fischer HC, Lazzaro EC, Barth KC, Stoykov ME, et al. Training finger individuation with a mechatronic-virtual reality system leads to improved fine motor control post-stroke. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2014 Dec 26;11(1).
2. Hä Ger-Ross C, Schieber MH. Quantifying the Independence of Human Finger Movements: Comparisons of Digits, Hands, and Movement Frequencies. 2000.
3. Wolbrecht ET, Rowe JB, Chan V, Ingemanson ML, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Finger strength, individuation, and their interaction: Relationship to hand function and corticospinal tract injury after stroke. Clinical Neurophysiology. 2018 Apr 1;129(4):797–808.
4. PENFIELD W, BOLDREY E. SOMATIC MOTOR AND SENSORY REPRESENTATION IN THE CEREBRAL CORTEX OF MAN AS STUDIED BY ELECTRICAL STIMULATION. Brain. 1937;60(4):389–443.
5. Compartmentalized dynamics within a common multi-area mesoscale manifold represent a repertoire of human hand movements;Natraj N;Neuron,2021