Neurological Outcomes in Traffic Accidents: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Medical and Non-Medical Origin Cases of Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Author:

Miyashita Yumiko1,Toyama Gen1,Takahashi Tsukasa2,Adachi Tetsuhiro2,Omatsu Kentaro1,Ozaki Akane2,Takei Yutaka1

Affiliation:

1. Graduate school of Health and Welfare, Niigata University of Health and Welfare

2. Department of Medical Sciences, Niigata University of Health and Welfare

Abstract

Abstract Aim: This study aimed to compare the characteristics of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases attributed to traffic accidents, distinguishing between medical and non-medical origins, and to explore the potential association between cases with a medical origin and a neurologically favourable outcome. Methods: We analysed 5,091 cases of traffic accidents that occurred between 2018 and 2020, classifying patients into two groups based on the Utstein style. The causes of arrest were categorized into cardiac and non-cardiac origins, with non-cardiac cases further subdivided into cerebrovascular events, traffic-related trauma, and other causes. Instances diagnosed by physicians as resulting from traffic-related trauma were labeled as "non-medical origin," while the remainder were classified as "medical origin.". Results: Medical-origin cases exhibited several distinct characteristics, including higher frequencies of occurrence during the daytime (79.3% [706/890] vs. 68.9% [2,895/4,201], p < 0.001), a higher prevalence among male (77.8% [692/890] vs. 68.3% [2,871/4,201], p < 0.001) and younger patients (median [25–75%]: 63 years [42–77] vs. 66 years [50–76], p = 0.003), a higher proportion of shockable initial rhythms(10.5% [93/890] vs. 1.1% [45/4,201], p < 0.001), an increased number of cases requiring advanced airway management (33.8% [301/890] vs. 28.5% [1,199/4,201], p = 0.002) and adrenaline administration by emergency medical teams (26.9% [239/890] vs. 21.7% [910/4,201], p < 0.001), and shorter transport times (55.3% [492/890] vs. 60.9% [2,558/4,201], p = 0.002) compared to non-medical-origin cases. However, medical-origin cases also demonstrated lower witness rates (42.8% [381/890] vs. 27.2% [1,142/4,201], p < 0.001) and were less likely to be transported to higher-level hospitals (55.3% [492/890] vs. 60.9% [2,558/4,201], p = 0.002). Propensity score matching analysis identified factors associated with favourable neurological outcomes in traffic accidents with medical-origin cases. The odds ratios were as follows: 8.46 (3.47–20.61) for cases with shockable initial rhythms, 2.36 (1.01–5.52) for cases involving traffic accidents due to medical origin, and 0.09 (0.01–0.67) for cases where advanced airway management was not provided. Conclusion: Medical-origin cases showed higher frequencies during the daytime, with a greater prevalence among male and younger patients, and a higher proportion of shockable initial rhythms. Additionally, these cases received more advanced airway management approaches and adrenaline but exhibited lower witness rates and were less likely to be transported to higher-level hospitals. This study identified factors associated with favourable neurological outcomes, including shockable initial rhythms, medical-origin accidents, and non-provision of advanced airway management. These findings will contribute to improving emergency medical care and accident management in medical-related traffic accidents.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference19 articles.

1. Road traffic injury prevention initiatives: a systematic review and metasummary of effectiveness in low and middle income countries;Staton C;PLoS One,2016

2. Trends in road traffic accidents in Anambra State, South Eastern Nigeria: need for targeted sensitization on safe roads;Anebonam U;Pan Afr Med. J,2019

3. Global burden of road traffic accidents in older adults: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis;Ang BH;Arch Gerontol Geriatr,2017

4. Characteristics and outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurring while in a motor vehicle;Sado J;Am J Cardiol,2018

5. National Police Agency. Traffic Accident Incidents in the Year 2020: An Overview. https://www.npa.go.jp/publications/statistics/koutsuu/jiko/R02bunseki.pdf (in Japanese) (2023)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3