Affiliation:
1. Universitätsspital Zürich Klinik für Rheumatologie: Universitatsspital Zurich Klinik fur Rheumatologie
2. University Hospital Zurich Department of Rheumatology: Universitatsspital Zurich Klinik fur Rheumatologie
3. : The University of Melbourne Department of Microbiology and Immunology
4. Balgrist University Hospital: Universitatsklinik Balgrist
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The multimodal properties of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs), particularly their ability to modulate immune responses is of high interest in translational research. Pro-inflammatory, hypoxic, and 3D culture priming are promising and often used strategies to improve the immunosuppressive potency of MSCs, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Therefore, the aims of this study were i) to compare the effects of pro-inflammatory, hypoxic, and 3D culture priming on the in vitro immunosuppressive potential of MSCs, ii) to assess if immunosuppressive priming effects are temporally preserved under standard and translationally relevant culture conditions, and iii) to investigate if the three priming strategies engage the same immunosuppressive mechanisms.
Methods
Functional in vitro T cell suppressive potency measurements were conducted to assess the impact of pro-inflammatory, hypoxic, and 3D culture priming on the immunosuppressive potential of human bone marrow-derived MSCs. Primed MSCs were either cultured under standard cell culture conditions or translationally relevant culture conditions, and their transcriptomic adaptations were monitored over time. Next-generation sequencing was performed to assess if different priming strategies activate distinct immunosuppressive mechanisms.
Results
i) Pro-inflammatory, hypoxic, and 3D culture priming induced profound transcriptomic changes in MSCs resulting in a significantly enhanced T cell suppressive potential of pro-inflammatory and 3D culture primed MSCs. ii) Priming effects rapidly faded under standard cell culture conditions but were partially preserved under translationally relevant conditions. Interestingly, continuous 3D culture priming of MSCs maintained the immunosuppressive potency of MSCs. iii) Next-generation sequencing revealed that priming strategy-specific differentially expressed genes are involved in the T cell suppressive capacity of MSCs, indicating that different priming strategies engage distinct immunosuppressive mechanisms.
Conclusion
Priming can be a useful approach to improve the immunosuppressive potency of MSCs. However, future studies involving primed MSCs should carefully consider the significant impact of translationally relevant conditions on the preservation of priming effects. Continuous 3D culture could act as a functionalized formulation, supporting the administration of MSC spheroids for a sustainably improved immunosuppressive potency.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference59 articles.
1. Herger N, Bermudez-Lekerika P, Farshad M, Albers CE, Distler O, Gantenbein B et al. Should Degenerated Intervertebral Discs of Patients with Modic Type 1 Changes Be Treated with Mesenchymal Stem Cells? Int J Mol Sci [Internet]. 2022;23(5):2721. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/23/5/2721.
2. Shattering barriers toward clinically meaningful MSC therapies;Levy O;Sci Adv,2020
3. Zhou T, Yuan Z, Weng J, Pei D, Du X, He C et al. Challenges and advances in clinical applications of mesenchymal stromal cells. J Hematol Oncol [Internet]. 2021;14(1):1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-021-01037-x.
4. Viswanathan S, Shi Y, Galipeau J, Krampera M, Leblanc K, Martin I et al. Mesenchymal stem versus stromal cells: International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy (ISCT®) Mesenchymal Stromal Cell committee position statement on nomenclature. Cytotherapy [Internet]. 2019;21(10):1019–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2019.08.002.
5. Dominici M, Blanc K, Le, Mueller I, Marini FC, Krause DS, Deans RJ et al. Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy [Internet]. 2006;8(4):315–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14653240600855905.