Analysis of the use of anesthetic blocks versus local anesthesia infiltration in primary total knee arthroplasty surgery.

Author:

Gómez Silvia Gómez1,Mata Julián Carlos Segura1,Nalvaiz José Tomás Alcalá1,García Felicito García-Álvarez1,Zaldívar Clara Marín,Goiricelaya Amagoia Fernández de Gamarra

Affiliation:

1. University of Zaragoza

Abstract

Abstract PURPOSE The aim of this study is to analyze the efficacy of the use of a combined infiltration between popliteal artery and knee capsule (IPACK) anesthetic block together with selective saphenous nerve block, versus local infiltration with anesthetic in knee replacement surgery. METHODS A retrospective observational study was performed. There were reviewed 312 patients who underwent primary total knee prosthesis at our hospital between January 2019 and December 2022, regardless of the reason for the surgical indication. Between January 2019 and November 2021, 207 patients were performed local intraarticular anesthesia (LIA) during the surgery. Since November 2021 to December 2022, 105 patients received the combined nerve blocks (IPACK + ACB group). The average age in the LIA group was 72.9 years while in the blocks group it was 70.4 years. There were 44% of men in the LIA group and 53.3% in the blocks group. The primary outcome was the presence of poorly controlled pain that requires opioid analgesic rescue in the postoperative period. Secondary outcomes included pain scores measured using the visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion assessed with a goniometer and hospital length stay. RESULTS There were no significant differences in age or sex patient distribution between the two groups. Only one patient treated with anesthetic blocks required rescue analgesia with minor opioids. Patients treated with LIA required treatment with minor opioids in 28.5% of cases. There were not statistically significant differences (p = 0.0964) between VAS in the LIA group and in the blocks group in the first 24h, although patients treated with LIA presented less elevated VAS data (mean 2.3 versus 2.7). The range of motion was slightly greater (4.6º, statistically significant data, < 0.05) in the blocks group. There were statistically significant differences in terms of hospital stay (2.4 days in the blocks group and 2.8 days in the LIA group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION In our series patients treated with anesthetic blocks showed better results with similar control of postoperative pain. However, more studies would be needed.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference37 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3