Affiliation:
1. University Politecnica delle Marche
2. University of Verona
3. University of Ferrara
4. IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo"
5. University of L'Aquila
6. Golgi Redaelli Istitute
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: In the evolving healthcare landscape, technology has emerged as a key component in enhancing system efficiency and offering new avenues for patient rehabilitation. Despite its growing importance, detailed information on technology's specific use, types, and applications in clinical rehabilitation settings, particularly within the Italian framework, remains unclear. This study aimed to explore the use of technology and its needs by Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation medical doctors in Italy. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey aimed at 186 Italian clinicians affiliated with the Italian Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (SIMFER). The online questionnaire consists of 71 structured questions designed to collect demographic and geographical data of the respondents, as well as detailed insights into the prevalence and range of technologies they use, together with their specific applications in clinical settings." Results: A broad range of technologies, predominantly commercial medical devices, has been documented. These technologies are employed for various conditions, including common neurological diseases, musculoskeletal disorders, dementia, and rheumatologic issues. The application of these technologies indicates a broadening scope beyond enhancing sensorimotor functions, addressing both physical and social aspects of patient care. Discussion: In recent years, there's been a notable surge in using technology for rehabilitation across various disorders. The upcoming challenge is to update health policies to integrate these technologies better, aiming to extend their benefits to a wider range of disabling conditions, marking a progressive shift in public health and rehabilitation practices.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference38 articles.
1. 1. GBD 2016 Neurology Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of neurological disorders, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019 May;18(5):459–80.
2. 2. Ding C, Wu Y, Chen X, Chen Y, Wu Z, Lin Z, et al. Global, regional, and national burden and attributable risk factors of neurological disorders: The Global Burden of Disease study 1990–2019. Front Public Health. 2022;10:952161.
3. 3. Wade DT. Describing rehabilitation interventions. Clin Rehabil. 2005 Dec;19(8):811–8.
4. 4. Wade DT. What is rehabilitation? An empirical investigation leading to an evidence-based description. Clin Rehabil. 2020 May;34(5):571–83.
5. 5. Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2021 Dec 19;396(10267):2006–17.