Application of the PANELVIEW instrument to evaluate the guideline development process of the German polytrauma guideline

Author:

Goossen Käthe1,Bieler Dan2,Weise Alina1,Nothacker Monika3,Flohé Sascha4,Pieper Dawid1

Affiliation:

1. Witten/Herdecke University

2. German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine- University

3. Philipps Universität Marburg/AWMF Berlin

4. Städtisches Klinikum Solingen

Abstract

Abstract Background PANELVIEW is an instrument for evaluating the appropriateness of the process, methods, and outcome of guideline development and the satisfaction of the guideline group with these steps. Objective To evaluate the guideline development process of the German guideline on the treatment of patients with severe/multiple injuries (‘German polytrauma guideline’) from the perspective of the guideline group, and to identify areas where this process may be improved in the future. Methods We administered PANELVIEW to the participants of the 2022 update of the German polytrauma guideline. All guideline group members, including delegates of participating medical societies, steering group members, authors of guideline chapters, the chair and methodological lead, were invited to participate. Responses were analysed using descriptive statistics. Comments received were categorised by domains/items of the tool. Results After the first, second, and last consensus conference, the guideline group was invited via email to participate in a web-based survey. Response rates were 36% (n/N = 13/36), 40% (12/30), and 37% (20/54), respectively. The mean scores for items ranged between 5.1 and 6.9 on a scale from 1 (fully disagree) to 7 (fully agree). Items with mean scores below 6.0 were related to (1) administration, (2) consideration of patients’ views, perspectives, values and preferences, and (3) the discussion of research gaps and needs for future research. Conclusion The PANELVIEW tool showed that the guideline group was satisfied with most aspects of the guideline development process. Areas for improvement of the process were identified. Strategies to improve response rates should be explored.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference12 articles.

1. Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play;Kredo T;Int J Qual Health Care,2016

2. Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise;Schünemann HJ;CMAJ,2014

3. Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice. G. In: Graham R, Mancher M, Miller Wolman D, Greenfield S, Steinberg E, editors. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). Copyright 2011 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.; 2011.

4. Guidelines International Network: toward international standards for clinical practice guidelines;Qaseem A;Ann Intern Med,2012

5. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care;Brouwers MC;CMAJ,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3