Efficacy and Safety of Early Versus Delayed Reconstruction for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author:

Guo Tian-Ci1,Feng Hui-Chuan1,Yu Wei-Jie1,Chen Ji-Xin1,Zhai Jing-Bo2,Liu Ai-Feng1

Affiliation:

1. First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion

2. Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background: The selection of early and delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a controversial issue in the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of early versus delayed ACLR for ACL injuries based on the different cut-off values of the timing of operation. Methods:PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature, and Wanfang Digital Periodical database were searched from inception to October 2022 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing early ACLR and delayed ACLR for ACL injuries were included. Results:Twenty-four studies (10 RCTs and 14 CSs) were included. According to the information from included studies, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after ACL injuries were considered as the cut-off values of early and delayed ACLR respectively. The results of CSs showed that early ACLR performed within 4 weeks or 12 months after ACL injuries could significantly improve the Lysholm score and VAS score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and decrease the incidence of adverse events compared with delayed ACLR (P < 0.05). Our meta-analysis involving RCTs or CSs showed that early ACLR performed within 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months or 12 months after ACL injuries could significantly increase the IKDC score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with delayed ACLR (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference in the positive rate of Lachman test and incidence of meniscus injuries and chondral lesions between two groups when 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months or 12 months after ACL injuries were considered as the cut-off values of early and delayed ACLR (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The present study suggests that early ACLR performed within 4 weeks after ACL injuries may be more effective for improving the knee function and relieving the pain compared to delayed ACLR. More high-quality studies are still warranted.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference53 articles.

1. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Wiggins AJ;Am J Sports Med,2016

2. Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Bahr R, Beynnon BD, Demaio M, Gottlob CA, Baker CL, Pellissier JM, Colvin L et al. Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young athletes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:272 – 82.

3. Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury and functional ankle instability: a correlation study in young adults;Zhang CD;Chin J Orthop Trauma,2021

4. Evidence-based clinical practice update:practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus;Melick N;Br J Sports Med,2016

5. Clinical evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury (2022 version);Bai LH;Chin J Trauma,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3