Affiliation:
1. First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Chinese Medicine Acupuncture and Moxibustion
2. Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Abstract
Abstract
Background: The selection of early and delayed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains a controversial issue in the management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. The purpose of this study was to critically evaluate the efficacy and safety of early versus delayed ACLR for ACL injuries based on the different cut-off values of the timing of operation.
Methods:PubMed, Medline, Embase, Cochrane library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature, and Wanfang Digital Periodical database were searched from inception to October 2022 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies (CSs) comparing early ACLR and delayed ACLR for ACL injuries were included.
Results:Twenty-four studies (10 RCTs and 14 CSs) were included. According to the information from included studies, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after ACL injuries were considered as the cut-off values of early and delayed ACLR respectively. The results of CSs showed that early ACLR performed within 4 weeks or 12 months after ACL injuries could significantly improve the Lysholm score and VAS score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively and decrease the incidence of adverse events compared with delayed ACLR (P < 0.05). Our meta-analysis involving RCTs or CSs showed that early ACLR performed within 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months or 12 months after ACL injuries could significantly increase the IKDC score at 6 and 12 months postoperatively compared with delayed ACLR (P < 0.05). However, no statistically significant difference in the positive rate of Lachman test and incidence of meniscus injuries and chondral lesions between two groups when 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 6 months or 12 months after ACL injuries were considered as the cut-off values of early and delayed ACLR (P > 0.05).
Conclusion: The present study suggests that early ACLR performed within 4 weeks after ACL injuries may be more effective for improving the knee function and relieving the pain compared to delayed ACLR. More high-quality studies are still warranted.
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference53 articles.
1. Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Wiggins AJ;Am J Sports Med,2016
2. Griffin LY, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Bahr R, Beynnon BD, Demaio M, Gottlob CA, Baker CL, Pellissier JM, Colvin L et al. Cost effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young athletes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;367:272 – 82.
3. Non-contact anterior cruciate ligament injury and functional ankle instability: a correlation study in young adults;Zhang CD;Chin J Orthop Trauma,2021
4. Evidence-based clinical practice update:practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus;Melick N;Br J Sports Med,2016
5. Clinical evidence-based guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury (2022 version);Bai LH;Chin J Trauma,2022