Guidance strategies for infantile asymmetry prevention: A Systematic Review

Author:

Ellwood Julie1,Sampath Kesava Kovanur2,Rund Iryna1,Treffel Loïc3,Draper-Rodi Jerry1

Affiliation:

1. University College of Osteopathy

2. Waikato Institute of Technology

3. Institut Toulousain d’Ostéopathie-Institut de Recherche Franc’Ostéo

Abstract

Abstract

Background: Infantile asymmetries of posture, movement and/or shape are common. Coincidence in the presentation of asymmetrical features can lead to a broad spectrum of descriptors. Evidence-based guidelines on prevention strategies are not currently available. The objective of this systematic review was to find, evaluate, and synthesise the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of prevention strategies for infantile asymmetries, specifically strategies involving paediatric screening and/or guidance to parents. Methods: This review has been reported based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) and the review protocol was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework, (https://osf.io/rgzev/). Searches were conducted on Ovid Medline, Ovid AMED, and PEDro. Inclusion criteria of articles were infants <16 weeks old who had received either an early musculoskeletal screen and/or education to parents on home care guidance/exercises to prevent asymmetry development. Any primary research was included. There was no limit placed upon date of publication. Data was screened, extracted and appraised in duplicate by at least two blinded reviewers. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias available as part of Covidence was used by two reviewers independently. Results: 702 papers were retrieved and 15 articles were included; 6 randomised controlled trials, 6 cohort studies and 3 non-randomised experimental studies. The presenting conditions were head shape asymmetry in 10/15 studies and movement asymmetry of congenital muscular torticollis in the remaining 5 studies. Due to a lack of homogeneity between all the studies, it was not possible to pool the data and conduct meta-analysis. Guidance strategies show better outcomes in asymmetry prevention when provided early (< 3 months) and under supervision of a healthcare professional. The overall risk of bias for cohort and non-randomised experimental studies was considered to be ‘low’, and ‘adequate’ or ‘low’ for randomised controlled trials. The GRADE level of evidence was found to be ‘very low’. Conclusion: Early parental guidance may prevent infantile asymmetry when supervised by a trained healthcare professional and with good adherence from parents. Further studies with a higher methodological rigour are needed to identify and perform comparative interventions. Clinical Trial Number: Not applicable OSF number: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/RGZEV

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3