Unnecessary Preoperative Workup in Healthy Patients with Isolated Orthopedic Trauma: An Area of Healthcare Waste

Author:

Wright Branden1,Morley Meghan2,Gentile Pietro3,Freeland Erik3

Affiliation:

1. Cooper Medical School of Rowan University

2. Department of Orthopaedics, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo

3. Cooper Bone and Joint Institute, Cooper University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Reducing waste is at the forefront for healthcare administrators, and one area to target is routine pre-operative testing. Despite the availability of professional/societal guidelines, physicians continue to order routine preoperative tests. Preoperative tests rarely influence surgical management, and there is data supporting safety without preoperative testing in low-risk surgeries for healthy patients. We believe these principles can be extrapolated to low-risk orthopedic procedures in healthy patients, such as isolated distal extremity fractures. We believe there will be enough wasted expenditure with unnecessary preoperative workup in isolated orthopedic trauma to warrant change in preoperative management. Methods A retrospective analysis of 209 cases of isolated distal extremity fractures from July 2019-July 2020 was conducted. Charts were queried for preoperative tests completed. Each case’s respective series of preoperative tests were compared to what professional/societal guidelines deemed appropriate. A decision-making analysis was performed to assess physician overordering. Total number of unnecessary tests was calculated, and cost analysis was completed to determine potential waste. Results 98% of cases had at least one unnecessary test. Coagulation profiles and blood type tests were the most commonly over-ordered tests at 90% of the time. Cost analysis revealed $262,624 in potentially wasted expenditure. Blood type tests and chest x-rays represented the largest portion, with $129,654 and $71,694 of wasted expenditure respectively. Conclusion We recommend the implementation of multimodal interventions in clinics treating these injuries. Interventions should include components of provider education, provider audit and feedback, and EMR ordering restrictions to reduce this area of waste.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference25 articles.

1. Callaghan J, Goldstein J, Messler J, Nickel W, Bulger J, Bulger J et al. Choosing wisely in adult hospital medicine: Five opportunities for improved healthcare value. J Hosp Med [Internet]. 2013 Sep 1 [cited 2020 Mar 18];8(9). Available from: https://www.journalofhospitalmedicine.com/jhospmed/article/127568/choosing-wisely-hospital-medicine

2. Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia EvaluationA Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2002 Feb 1;96(2):485–96.

3. Practice Advisory for Preanesthesia EvaluationAn Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiol J Am Soc Anesthesiol. 2012 Mar 1;116(3):522–38.

4. O’Neill F, Carter E, Pink N, Smith I. Routine preoperative tests for elective surgery: summary of updated NICE guidance. BMJ [Internet]. 2016 Jul 14 [cited 2020 May 8];354. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/354/bmj.i3292

5. Fleisher LA, Beckman JA, Brown KA, Calkins H, Chaikof EL, Fleischmann KE et al. ACC/AHA 2007 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation and Care for Noncardiac Surgery: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines on Perioperative Cardiovascular Evaluation for Noncardiac Surgery) Developed in Collaboration With the American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Heart Rhythm Society, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, and Society for Vascular Surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Oct 23;50(17):e159–242.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3