A Salutogenic Signature of the Placebo Effect in Brain Oscillations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Fregni Felipe1ORCID,Ortega-Márquez Jorge1,Gonzalez-Gonzalez Luis Fernando1,Sosa William1,Pacheco-Barrios Kevin1

Affiliation:

1. Harvard Medical School

Abstract

Abstract

Brain oscillatory activity and its role as a biomarker in mental health and human behavioral mechanisms stands as an unexplored tool to explain the placebo effect. This systematic review and meta-analysis characterize, for the first time, the neural mechanistic biomarkers of placebo effect in neurorehabilitation. A systematic literature search based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library including randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cross-over trials up to August 2023. The review included studies reporting brain oscillations in resting state as outcome in placebo-controlled neurorehabilitation trials. A qualitative, semi-quantitative, quantitative analysis was performed using minimal statistical information from each study and calculating effect sizes of absolute power differences between placebo and active intervention groups using Hedges’ g statistic method. The analysis included 63 studies: 5 (180 healthy subjects) and 58 (1758 patients with neurological disorders). In healthy population, placebo interventions showed an increase in alpha power when comparing versus no intervention (g = 0.45, 95% CI [0.09; 0.8]). In subjects with neurological disorders sham intervention showed increase in alpha frontal (g = 0.08, 95% CI [0.07; 0.08] ), alpha central (g = 0.55, 95% CI [0.47; 0.65]), alpha parietal (g = 0.28, 95% CI [0.18; 0.44]), beta central (g = 1.31, 95% CI [1.06; 1.63]), and theta central (g = 0.58, 95% CI [0.46; 0.72]). Interestingly, these effects became non-significant when comparing with the active interventions. In both populations, the enhancement of alpha oscillations in fronto-central regions emerged as the primary neural biomarker of the placebo effect. Furthermore, increase in beta and theta bands within the same brain regions were also noted as potential biomarkers, particularly in non-healthy subjects. Intriguingly, these effects were reversed when compared to active rehabilitation interventions, suggesting that active rehabilitation techniques also encompass the placebo effect. Our novel results show that placebo neural effects depend on the brain oscillatory baseline (healthy vs. patient populations), and they seem to unmask a more homeostatic salutogenic rhythm, such as alpha oscillations in healthy subjects and theta and beta oscillations in patient populations.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference158 articles.

1. NCI. Placebo. 2024 [cited 2024 May 5]; Available from: https://www.cancer.gov/publications/dictionaries/cancer-terms/def/placebo.

2. Teaching neurons to respond to placebos;Benedetti F;J Physiol,2016

3. Pain and the placebo: what we have learned;Hoffman GA;Perspect Biol Med,2005

4. Myths and Truths about Placebo Effect in Rehabilitation for Musculoskeletal Pain;Iolascon G;Adv Ther,2021

5. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment;Hróbjartsson A;N Engl J Med,2001

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3