Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening in mammography (AI-STREAM): Preliminary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study

Author:

Chang Yun Woo1ORCID,Ryu Jung Kyu2,An Jin Kyung3,Choi Nami4,Ko Kyung Hee5,Han KyunghwaORCID,Park Young Mi6

Affiliation:

1. Soonchunhyang University Hospital Seoul

2. Department of radiology, Kyung hee University Hospital at Gangdong

3. department of Radiology, Nowon Eulgi University Hostpial

4. Department of Radiology, Konkuk University Medical center

5. Department of Radiology, CHA Bundang Medical center, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of medicine

6. Department of radiology, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Several studies have shown that artificial intelligence (AI) improves mammography screening accuracy. Meanwhile, prospective evidence, particularly in a single-read setting, is lacking. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of breast radiologists, with and without an AI-based computer-aided detection (AI-CAD) for interpreting screening mammograms in a real-world, single-read setting. A prospective multicenter cohort study in six academic hospitals participant in South Korea’s national breast cancer screening program was done, where women aged ³40 years were eligible for enrollment between February 2021 and December 2022. The primary outcome was screen-detected breast cancer diagnosed at a one-year follow-up. The primary analysis compared cancer detection rate (CDRs) and recall rates (RRs) of breast imaging specialized radiologists, with and without AI assistance. The exploratory, secondary analysis compared CDRs and RRs of general radiologists, with and without AI, as well as radiologists versus standalone AI. Of 25,008 women who were eligible for enrollment, 24,543 women were included in the final cohort (median age 61 years [IQR 51-68]), with 140 (0.57%) screen-detected breast cancers. The CDR was significantly higher by 13.8% for breast radiologists with AI-CAD (n=140 [5.70 ‰]) versus those without AI (n=123 [5.01 ‰]; p <0.001), with no significant difference in RRs (p =0.564). Similar trends were observed for general radiologists, with a significant 26.4% higher CDR in those with AI-CAD (n=120 [4.89 ‰]) versus those without AI (n=95 [3.87 ‰]; p <0.001). The CDR of standalone AI (n=128 [5.21 ‰]) was also significantly higher than that of general radiologists without AI (p=0.027), with no significant differences in RRs (p =0.809). This preliminary result from a prospective, multicenter cohort study provided evidence of significant improvement in CDRs without affected RRs of breast radiologists when using AI-CAD, as compared to not using AI-CAD, when interpreting screening mammograms in a radiologist’s standard single reading setting. Furthermore, AI-CAD assistance could potentially improve radiologist’s reading performance, regardless of experience (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT0524591).

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3