Symptomatic Malignant Ascites Drainage with a Patient-controlled Vascular Catheter – interim analysis of safety and patients’ reported outcomes

Author:

Stukan Maciej1,Jedryka Marcin2,Cokan Andrej3,Klát Jaroslav4,Iheme Munachiso Ndukwe5,Kryszpin Marcin2,Poblocka Renata6,Timošek Eva3,Romanová Martina4,Kolarová Klára5,Madry Radoslaw7,Cibula David8

Affiliation:

1. Pomeranian Hospitals

2. Dolnośląskie Centrum Onkologii

3. UMC Maribor

4. University Hospital Ostrava

5. UH Hradec Králové

6. Renata Poblocka Individual Practice

7. Oncology Clinic, Medical University of Poznan

8. Charles University and General University Hospital

Abstract

Abstract

Malignant ascites (MA) and repeated paracentesis can impair patient’s quality of life (QOL). The aim was to evaluate changes in patients’ QOL and the safety of MA drainage with a patient-controlled central vascular catheter (CVC) inserted into the abdominal cavity. This is an interim analysis of a prospective, multicentre trial ongoing within the Central and Eastern European Gynaecologic Oncology Group (CEEGOG). CVC (14-Ga) was inserted into the abdominal cavity of patients with symptomatic MA and drainage was controlled by patients at home. The rate and quality of complications were classified according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. QOL was evaluated before and 10-14 days after/during drainage with standardized QLQ-C15-PAL, SGA, and FACIT-TS-G questionnaires. Wilcoxon and Chi-squared tests were used. Among 113 recruited patients (2015-2022) 8 adverse events were detected in 7 patients (6.2%), including one serious (death on the 9th day after catheter insertion, classified as not related to the intervention). Other complications were local infection (n=2) (resolved after oral antibiotics), catheter obstruction (n=2), catheter self-removal (n=2) (re-insertion performed), and nausea (n=1). When comparing the assessment before and after/during drainage, we found the significantly better global quality of life (mean 31.8 vs 47.8, p<0.001), improvement in physical (52.6 vs 64.4, p<0.001) and emotional functioning (50.7 vs 65.4, p<0.001); symptoms were significantly less intense: fatigue (66.7 vs 50.9, p<0.001), nausea and vomiting (37.8 vs 21.4, p<0.001), pain (53.9 vs 34.1, p<0.001), dyspnoea (48.5 vs 22.3, p<0.001), insomnia (49.1 vs 34.3, p<0.001), appetite loss (56.3 vs 40.3, p<0.001), constipation (31.0 vs 25.2, p=0.007), and more patients had no pain on eating (71.3% vs 82.9%, p=0.04). Most patients (78%) were satisfied, 83% would recommend the procedure to others, and 90% would choose intervention again. MA drainage via patient-controlled CVC inserted into the abdominal cavity is safe and improves patients’ QOL.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3