Removal of Osseointegrated Implants: Surgical Techniques and New Approaches, a Systematic Review

Author:

Tafuri Giuseppe1,D'Addazio Gianmaria1,Manciocchi Eugenio1,Rexhepi Imena1,Santilli Manlio1,Caputi Sergio1,Sinjari Bruna1

Affiliation:

1. University of Chieti-Pescara

Abstract

Abstract Background Today dental implants represent an effective therapy in case of partial or total edentulism, with an excellent success rate. Despite the results obtained, there may be biological or mechanical complications during the therapy, which lead to the loss of the implant. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current state of the art in the literature on techniques used for the removal of dental implants. Various aspects will be analyzed, such as the success of the technique, any complications, and the advantages and disadvantages of their use. Methods Two reviewers conducted a literature analysis (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science) of the last 20 years (2003–2023). The main criterion analyzed was the success of the technique, while secondary outcomes such as complications and risks of the technique were also analyzed. 258 articles were identified in the various search databases. 42 eligible articles were subsequently identified after an article screening. Only 18 full texts were subsequently included in the review. Results A total of 18 articles were selected and 1142 implants and 595 patients were included. The main techniques used were the Counter-Torque Ratchet Technique (CTRT), Piezosurgery, trephine drills, carbide burs, Erbium, Chromium, Yttrium, Scandium, Gallium, Garnett (Er:Cr:YSGG) laser and carbon dioxide (CO2) laser. Combined uses of techniques have been identified such as: Piezosurgery and trephine burs or carbide burs, trephine burs with the use of a 3d-printed-guide, CTRT and trephine burs. The technique with the highest success rate, less morbidity for the patient, and less removal of bone appears to be the CTRT. Conclusions The use of conservative techniques, especially CTRT, in bone removal is useful to allow for immediate implant placement in the removal area. However, further studies with a high sample size are needed to be performed on all techniques, particularly new RCTs that allow for the analysis of the success of alternative techniques such as Laser and Piezosurgery, which appear to be very promising.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference43 articles.

1. Klinge B, Flemming T, Cosyn J, De Bruyn H, Eisner BM, Hultin M et al. The patient undergoing implant therapy. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO Consensus Conference 2015. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015;26.

2. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses;Goodacre CJ;J Prosthet Dent,2003

3. An update;Dental endosseous implants;J Am Dent Assoc,2004

4. Biological factors contributing;Esposito M;Eur J Oral Sci,1998

5. Dental implants: Maintenance, care and treatment of peri-implant infection;Chen S;Aust Dent J,2003

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3