Radical Surgical Treatment of Spinal Oligometastatic Disease with Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression–Outcome and Evaluation of Feasibility of Carbon Fibre Reinforced PEEK Instrumentation in Comparison to Standard Titanium Fixation

Author:

Saha Priyanshu1,Siller Sebastian2,Cox Kofi1,Uthayanan Leshanth1,Buckley Thomas3,Tsang Emily1,Hwang Zion1,Ajayi Bisola2,Kurban Tesfaldet2,Ahmed Merina4,Khoo Vincent4,Bernard Jason2,Bishop Timothy2,Silva Vino2,Minhas Pawan2,Papadopoulos Marios2,Lui Darren F.2

Affiliation:

1. St. George’s University of London

2. St. George’s NHS Foundation Trust

3. Royal College of Surgeon Ireland

4. The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Oligometastatic disease (≤ 3 extracranial metastases) is hypothesised as the intermediary state between localised and widespread metastatic disease. However, in terms of spinal oligometastatic disease, data on oncological outcome after radical surgical treatment are still lacking in literature. The same applies to the advantages of CFR-PEEK instrumentation in this specific patient cohort compared to the use of titanium fixation. Methods: We retrospectively analysed our prospectively collected consecutive cohort of patients undergoing radical surgical treatment (en-bloc and separation surgery) for spinal oligometastatic disease between 2018–2023 at our quaternary level 1 spinal centre; whenever possible postoperative SBRT was applied post adjuvant alongside systemic oncological treatment. Patient demographics, surgical and oncological characteristics as well as outcomes with regards to hardware malfunction, local recurrence rates and mortality were investigated and compared between the group with CFR-PEEK (CF) instrumentation and a control group with standard titanium (Ti) fixation. Follow-up was at least 12 months in every patient which ranged up to 60 months. Results: A total of 25 oligometastatic MSCC patients (mean age 58.8, male: 51%) all with Bilsky Score 1c or greater) who underwent radical surgical treatment using CFR-PEEK fixation (en-bloc: 5 patients, separation surgery: 20) for varying tumour histologies were included and compared to 24 patients (en-bloc: 4 patients, separation surgery: 20) with standard Ti fixation. Mean operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and length of inpatient stay for Separation Surgery was 234.8 minutes, 726.7ml and 21.0 days without any statistical differences between both CF and Ti groups. Mean operation time, intraoperative blood loss and length of inpatient stay for En Bloc was 718.3 minutes, 2345.0 ml and 55.0 days without any statistical differences between both CF and Ti groups. Postoperative complication rate was 11% (no significant differences between the CFR-PEEK and Ti group). At the last interval scan (mean: 17 months post-operative), the rate of construct failure or screw breakage was 0% in both CFR-PEEK and Ti groups. 2 patients in the CFR-PEEK group and 3 patients of the Ti group did not receive postoperative adjuvant SBRT due to inpatient death, autonomy, and non-local recurrent disease. While overall 1-year survival and local tumour control rates were 90% (100% in Separation Surgery) and 100% respectively in patients who received adjuvant SBRT, it was markedly worse in those patients that did not receive adjuvant SBRT (50% vs 0%); there were no significant differences in oncological survival between the CFR-PEEK and Ti groups (p = 0.4299). Conclusion: Radical surgical treatment concepts plus adjuvant SBRT are feasible in spinal oligometastatic disease and enable a favourable prognosis. The use of CF instrumentation in this context is equally safe compared to standard titanium fixation and may be beneficial due to its material-inherent advantages allowing superior planning and delivery of radiotherapy and the reduced artefacts on postoperative imaging.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3