Efficacy and safety of theta burst versus repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: a meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials

Author:

Liu Chaomeng1,Li Li1,Zhu Kemeng1,Liu Zhi2,Xing Wenlong3,Li Bing4,Jin Wenqing1,Lin Shuo1,Tan Weihao1,Pan Weigang1,Ren Li1,Zhang Qinge1

Affiliation:

1. National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders & National Center for Mental Disorders, Capital Medical University

2. Dongfang Hospital Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

3. First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University School of Medicine

4. The Sixth Clinical Medical College of Hebei University

Abstract

Abstract Background: Theta burst stimulation (TBS) is more energy- and time-efficient than standard repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). However, further studies are needed to analyze TBS therapy for its efficacy and safety compared to standard rTMS for major depressive disorder (MDD). The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare TBS therapy and standard rTMS treatment regarding their safety and therapeutic effect on individuals with MDD. Methods: Six databases (Wanfang, the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and PsycINFO) were searched from inception till November 20, 2022. Two independent reviewers selected potentially relevant studies based on the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and evaluated the methodological quality of the eligible trials using the modified 10-item Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale per PRISMA guidelines. Finally, ten comparable pairs of 9 randomized controlled trials were included for meta-analysis. Summary odds ratios (ORs) of the rates of response, remission, and adverse events were simultaneously calculated using quality-effects (QE) and random-effects (RE) models. Changes in depression scores associated with antidepressant effects were expressed using standardized mean differences (SMDs) simultaneously. This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022376790). Results: Nine of the 602 RCTs, covering 1196 cases (616 subjected to TBS protocols vs. 580 treated using standard rTMS), were enrolled. Differences in response rates between the above two treatment modalities were not significant (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.90–1.18, P > 0.05, I2 = 4%, RE model; OR = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.90–1.32, P > 0.05, I2 = 4%, QE model). Differences in adverse event rates between TBS and standard rTMS groups were not statistically significant. Conclusion: TBS has similar efficacy and safety as standard rTMS for treating MDD. In light of the short duration of daily stimulation sessions, this meta-analysis supports the continued development of TBS for treating depression.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3