Affiliation:
1. University Medical Center Utrecht
2. Stellenbosch University
Abstract
AbstractObjectives To determine whether corneal astigmatism magnitude is equivalent amongst individuals of African black, Mixed race and Caucasian descent in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Methods Observational, retrospective study including 117 African black, 156 Mixed race and 100 Caucasian participants. Corneal astigmatism parameters were obtained using a Pentacam corneal topographer. Ethnicity was self-reported. Data were collected during an earlier prospective study. All the participants had clinically normal eyes. Results Corneal astigmatism magnitude was equivalent among the three groups. The astigmatism magnitude was − 0.7 (0.7) (median (Interquartile range)) in African blacks, -0.8 (0.7) in Mixed race and − 0.7 (0.6) D in Caucasians. No difference was found for J0 (p = 0.24) and J45 (p = 0.99). Astigmatism type differed between the three groups (p = 0.008). With the rule astigmatism was most prevalent in Caucasians (80.1%), followed by African blacks (71.3%) and Mixed race (65.3%). Corneas were steeper in Caucasians and mixed race, compared to African blacks (p = 0.001). K1, K2 and Kmax respectively, were 42.4, 43.2 and 43.7 for the African black, 43.2, 44 and 44.8 for the Mixed race and 43.2, 43.8 and 44.5 D for the Caucasian group. Thinnest point of the cornea in African blacks, Mixed race and Caucasians were 500 (39), 510 (40), and 534 (45) µm (p < 0.001). Conclusion Astigmatism magnitude is comparable between ethnic groups in South Africa. Hence, we suggest that astigmatism is not influenced by ethnicity. Corneal power and thinnest point differed between the three ethnic groups
Publisher
Research Square Platform LLC
Reference34 articles.
1. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study;GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study;Lancet Glob Health.,2021
2. Grosvenor T. Primary Care Optometry. 5rd ed. (Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017).
3. The prevalence of refractive error in three communities of Cape Town, South Africa;Otutua M;South African Optometrist.,2012
4. Comparative Evaluation of the Corneal and Anterior Chamber Parameters Derived From Scheimpflug Imaging in Arab and South Asian Normal Eyes;Prakash G;Cornea.,2015
5. Comparison of corneal astigmatism characteristics and prevalence of corneal astigmatism between Turkish individuals and Syrian refugees;Guven S;Eur J Ophthalmol,2022