Corneal astigmatism in different ethnic groups in the Western Cape, South Africa.

Author:

Kleij Jeroen van1,Smit DerrickORCID,Bhika Raquel2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. University Medical Center Utrecht

2. Stellenbosch University

Abstract

AbstractObjectives To determine whether corneal astigmatism magnitude is equivalent amongst individuals of African black, Mixed race and Caucasian descent in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Methods Observational, retrospective study including 117 African black, 156 Mixed race and 100 Caucasian participants. Corneal astigmatism parameters were obtained using a Pentacam corneal topographer. Ethnicity was self-reported. Data were collected during an earlier prospective study. All the participants had clinically normal eyes. Results Corneal astigmatism magnitude was equivalent among the three groups. The astigmatism magnitude was − 0.7 (0.7) (median (Interquartile range)) in African blacks, -0.8 (0.7) in Mixed race and − 0.7 (0.6) D in Caucasians. No difference was found for J0 (p = 0.24) and J45 (p = 0.99). Astigmatism type differed between the three groups (p = 0.008). With the rule astigmatism was most prevalent in Caucasians (80.1%), followed by African blacks (71.3%) and Mixed race (65.3%). Corneas were steeper in Caucasians and mixed race, compared to African blacks (p = 0.001). K1, K2 and Kmax respectively, were 42.4, 43.2 and 43.7 for the African black, 43.2, 44 and 44.8 for the Mixed race and 43.2, 43.8 and 44.5 D for the Caucasian group. Thinnest point of the cornea in African blacks, Mixed race and Caucasians were 500 (39), 510 (40), and 534 (45) µm (p < 0.001). Conclusion Astigmatism magnitude is comparable between ethnic groups in South Africa. Hence, we suggest that astigmatism is not influenced by ethnicity. Corneal power and thinnest point differed between the three ethnic groups

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference34 articles.

1. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study;GBD 2019 Blindness and Vision Impairment Collaborators, Vision Loss Expert Group of the Global Burden of Disease Study;Lancet Glob Health.,2021

2. Grosvenor T. Primary Care Optometry. 5rd ed. (Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017).

3. The prevalence of refractive error in three communities of Cape Town, South Africa;Otutua M;South African Optometrist.,2012

4. Comparative Evaluation of the Corneal and Anterior Chamber Parameters Derived From Scheimpflug Imaging in Arab and South Asian Normal Eyes;Prakash G;Cornea.,2015

5. Comparison of corneal astigmatism characteristics and prevalence of corneal astigmatism between Turkish individuals and Syrian refugees;Guven S;Eur J Ophthalmol,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3