Assessing the Validity and Reliability of the Indonesian Version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health

Author:

Biben Vitriana1,Arisanti Farida1,Fitriana Efi2,Maklun Erika1,Miguna Vindy Margaretha1,Alviani Nabilla Fikria1

Affiliation:

1. Universitas Padjadjaran/dr.Hasan Sadikin General Hospital

2. Universitas Padjadjaran

Abstract

Abstract Background The assessment of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) is an essential clinical outcome, focusing on the subjective perception of individuals regarding their health status in the physical, mental, and social dimensions. However, HRQoL assessment in large-scale studies and mass inspections presents various challenges, necessitating the development of non-burdensome instrument. A promising instrument in this context is PROMIS Global Health, a widely used English tool, which requires translation, validation, and cross-cultural testing for non-English populations, such as Indonesia. Therefore, this study aimed to validate and assess the reliability of the Indonesian version of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health for comprehensive HRQoL assessment. Methods The sample population comprised 343 participants, including patients, caregivers, and residents of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. PROMIS Global Health was subjected to translation and cultural adaptation using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) method. Subsequently, the content validity test was carried out using S-CVI assessment of 5 experts, and the internal validity was evaluated with Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The reliability test was performed with Cronbach's Alpha for internal consistency as well as the test-retest method for external consistency and item discrimination analysis. Results Questions or statements in the Indonesian version of PROMIS Global Health based on S-CVI/Universal Agreement (0.90), χ2/df (1.53), RMSEA (0.04), RMR (0.03), and CFI (0.99). The reliability results showed that Chronbach's Alpha score for Global Physical Health (GPH) and Global Mental Health (GMH) was 0.61 and 0.77, respectively. In addition, the test-retest method showed a good correlation (GPH r = 0.727, p < 0.05; GMH r = 0.701, p < 05) with item analysis factor loading of > 0.3. Conclusion Based on the results, the validity and reliability tests showed that questions or statements in PROMIS Global Health were valid and reliable.

Publisher

Research Square Platform LLC

Reference30 articles.

1. The Quality of Life Definition;Cai T;Where Are We Going? Uro,2021

2. Karimi M, Brazier J, Health. Health-Related Quality of Life, and Quality of Life: What is the Difference? Pharmacoeconomics. 2016;34(7):645–9.

3. Predictors of health-related quality of life in stroke patients after neurological inpatient rehabilitation: A prospective study;Katona M;Health Qual Life Outcomes,2015

4. Quality of life assessment in rehabilitation medicine;Franchignoni F;Eura Medicophys,2003

5. An international standard set of patient-centered outcome measures after stroke;Salinas J;Strokes,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3