Assessing Decision-Making Skills with the Script Concordance Test (SCT) in Clinical Neurology and Emergency Medicine

Author:

Gudorf Helena-Fee1,Heidrich Maximilian1,Rauchstädt Kristoph1,Scherbaum Raphael1,Tönges Lars1,Biesalski Anne-Sophie1

Affiliation:

1. Ruhr University Bochum

Abstract

Abstract

Background Clinical reasoning is an essential medical competence that should be taught and assessed from the beginning of medical studies. One method to evaluate these skills is the Script Concordance Test (SCT), which presents daily clinical scenarios filled with uncertainty. Due to the lack of validated research on this method in Germany, particularly in the field of neurology, our study aimed to develop and implement an SCT at Ruhr University Bochum, and to compare different teaching methods (clinical seminar vs. digital video course) and their outcomes in the examination format. Methods A group of 6th-year medical students, who received the same education, completed an SCT after participating in either a clinical seminar or a digital video course. The SCT was developed using blueprints on stroke and epilepsy. The test consisted of 40 case vignettes, comprising 120 items. Initially, experts completed the test to establish the reference panel. The final high-stakes examination was created using the aggregate scoring method and an item analysis. Results The developed SCT was completed by 15 experts and 59 students. The final SCT consisted of 112 items and achieved a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.85. A significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed between the experts, who had a mean score of 81.75, and the students on the first assessment day, who had a mean score of 68.92. No significant differences were found between the different groups (interactive video course and seminar) or across different time points. The questionnaire revealed a sense of insecurity in clinical decision-making before the SCT and highlighted the need to incorporate clinical reasoning practices from the beginning of medical studies to mitigate fear in uncertain situations. The SCT helped structure decision-making processes and increased confidence in personal decisions. Conclusion The SCT proves to be a reliable and valid tool for assessing medical students throughout their university education. Regular exposure to the SCT format would facilitate familiarity with its structure. We propose utilizing the SCT as a learning tool rather than solely for assessment purposes. For instance, it could be integrated into teaching methodologies as a think-aloud exercise or incorporated into progress tests.

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference48 articles.

1. Charlin B:: What is so difficult about managing clinical reasoning difficulties?;Audétat M;Med Educ

2. Higgs J, Jensen GM, Loftus S, Christensen N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Edinburgh, London, New York. 4th edition: Elsevier; 2019.

3. Clinical Reasoning: Defining It, Teaching It, Assessing It, Studying It;Gruppen LD;western J Emerg Med,2017

4. Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning;Bowen JL;N Engl J Med,2006

5. Teaching clinical reasoning: case-based and coached;Kassirer JP;Acad medicine: J Association Am Med Colleges,2010

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3